Jailed Attorney Richard I Fine Reveals Cause of Court Corruption............ Interview Excerpt (2 min)
CLICK ON AUDIO PLAYER TO HEAR EXCERPT (2 min)
The Full Disclosure Network® presents a 2 minute audio clip from our jail interview with inmate Richard I. Fine where is pinpoints the source of corruption in L. A. County Courts. The entire one-hour is to be released to cable stations throughout California and in major cities across the country in April.
FEDERAL LAWSUIT PROMPTED SHERIFF TO OK INTERVIEW ?
On March 11, 2010 County Sheriff Leroy Baca reversed his long standing opposition to an interview with judicial corruption fighter Richard I Fine who has been held in L.A. County Central Men’s Jail for over a year, without a conviction, a jury trial, a release date or even a hearing date. Baca’s decision to let Full Disclosure Network® Producers Leslie Dutton and T. J. Johnston video record a one-hour interview with Fine in the jail came almost two months after Sterling Norris of the Judicial Watch, the public interest legal organization filed a lawsuit in the U.S. California Central District. The complaint requested declaratory relief asking the court to hold the Sheriff’s policy regarding media requests for inmate interviews unlawful on the basis of violations of First Amendment Rights of the Press.
RADIO, TV NEWS ASSN. ENDORSED LAWSUIT
Within days of filing the lawsuit on behalf of the Full Disclosure Network® the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles based Radio Television News Association (RTNA) passed a resolution supporting the litigation challenging the Sheriff's exclusionary policy.
RELATED LINKS TO VIDEO AND BACKGROUND:
Sheriff Denies Full Disclosure Media Access Video (7 min)
Dutton vs Baca U S California Central District Court Case 10-cv-0595
Dan Walters, Sacramento Bee Syndicated Column On Politics of Fine Case 3-11-10
Labels: Judicial Corruption, L A County Jail, Leslie Dutton, Richard I. Fine, T. J. Johnston

2 Comments:
Keep the pressure on! This man should not be in jail. Someone or some persons need to be held accountable for this facade. This is an injustice and for officers (judges) of the court to behave as if they're omnipotent is unconscionable
By
Anonymous, at Monday, March 15, 2010
Political terrorism, I believe this falls under,"inflicting harm, to promote, or advance a political view". Homeland security, is allowing terrorism in LA to go unchecked. This is a judicial jihad, and ignoring it will bring greater harm to California, and this nation. If homeland security won't address the issue, and do their duty, isn't that the same as supporting, and promoting, terrorism? If a regular citizen can be considered a terrorist, or, "enemy combatant", a group of individuals, no matter what status, inflicting harm on Americans, is a terrorist group, and must be treated as such.
By
joebanana, at Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Post a Comment
<< Home