Full Disclosure Network tm


Program Guide
Blog Releases
Transcripts

Buy Our Programs
Radio on the Web
TV Channel Guide
Subscribe to eNews
RSS Feed
SEARCH

Top Shows from our Archives

Feds Nail OC Sheriff: Justice or Abuse?
Belmont & School Construction
CUSD Recall
Valdemar/Gangs
Religion and Politics
Gun Issues
Historic California Recall
Immigration Policies
Media Ethics
Politics vs Terrorism
The Prosecutor & the Presidency
Re-appointment of LAPD Chief

Voter Fraud
Illegal Immigration
Political Corruption
War On Terrorism
Police Politics
Rule of Law
Border Security
Government Accountability

Attorney General
District Attorney
Sheriff & Chief of Police
Mayor
Special Interest Groups
Education

About Us
2001 Emmy Winner

Contact Us

 
Broadcasting of television, video and radio programs via a global computer network.

Release date: June 19, 2005

CONCEALED WEAPONS? SHERIFFS BACA & CARONA DEBATE
Preview Length: 4:56 mins

Get Our Detailed News Report Here!

Please make a Tax Deductible Contribution to the
Full Disclosure Network®
A Non-Profit Tax Exempt 501 (c) (3) Educational organization

Donate



Your name:

Your location:

Your comments:


Please type the code you see in the image
in the box below. (case sensitive)


Comments to date: 196.  This is page 1 of 20.

W. Shires   Tennessee

Posted: 06:55 pm [PST] on September 23 2008

I am retired Army. Your current policy is in fact a violation of our rights. Unless you can proivide me a full-time bodyguard, you are liable for any damages I suffer if you forcibly rstirct my right of self-defense.

Tommy Sherman   Texas

Posted: 06:18 am [PST] on September 23 2008

Austrailia & the UK have enacted strict gun control laws and their crime rates have skyrocketed. YOu want to see how strict gun control works in the US? Go no further than Washington DC or Chicago.

Chris Mallory   Paducah Kentucky

Posted: 06:15 am [PST] on September 23 2008

Sheriff Baca to most Citizens:
"You are sheep for me to shear. FU and your safety."

Pete Blanchard   Hanford, Ca.

Posted: 08:22 pm [PST] on July 31 2008

One last rant before I stop. I served in the Navy for over 7 years. I was honorably discharged. I have never been arrested or convicted of any crime. I am a National Rifle Association certified Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor. I taught over 10,000 Military and Law Enforcement personnel in the three plus years I was a Navy Firearms Instructor. And now as a civilian I cant carry a gun because someone with less training and experiance than me decided I am a risk?! What happened to the right to life libert and the persuit of happiness? Is anyone else sick of politicians deciding to protect me from myself? Maybe its time we start a petition to strike down all of the useless anti gun laws. They sure have not done anything to stop the surge in violent crime in the last 30 years. But God forbid a law abiding citizen wants to protect their life, or their family, or their property.

Pete Blanchard   Hanford, Ca.

Posted: 08:17 pm [PST] on July 31 2008

Look at Frank White. He is a San Diego cop on trial for shooting a woman after she chased him and his wife and then rammed their car with her vehicle. Her BAC was twice the legal limit and she was in possesion of marijuana. Now he is on trial for protectiing himself and his wife. WELCOME TO COMMUNIST CALIFORNIA, PLEASE LEAVE YOUR RIGHTS AT THE BORDER!

Pete Blanchard   Hanford, Ca.

Posted: 08:12 pm [PST] on July 31 2008

Look at the crime rates in "shall issue" states as compared to "non issue" states. Per capita the rates are ALWAYS lower in the "shall issue" states.

S. Adam   Los Angeles County

Posted: 10:11 am [PST] on June 30 2008

Law abiding citizens will not carry a concealed firearm without a permit, whereas law breaking citizens will carry around a weapon as they please and use it to help further break the law. Keeping citizens from carrying only stops the lawful from being armed as criminals will do it regardless of having a permit or not. Violating and/or hindering the Second Amendment is shameful and as good citizens, we should be awarded this right to carry.

larry janson   northern ca.

Posted: 01:02 pm [PST] on May 09 2008


I belive no permit should be needed to protect ones self, ones family, and property.

But as a permit is requird, yes it should be a shall issue, with only a back ground check, and a traning (no more that say 18 hours long)where one only needs to show working knolage and handling of your weapon, along with some book work on the laws dealing with use of deadly force.

.

Glenn   Los Angeles

Posted: 07:20 pm [PST] on April 02 2008

The people who oppose CCW shall-issue standardization claim that the average citizen is not a target, that it's only "high profile" people who might need to be armed. Well, explain that to the ordinary man or woman who has been assaulted, robbed, or raped. And, then follow that up with a lecture on the merits of non-violent conflict resolution.
When criminals know that people are likely to be unarmed, it sure makes their objective a lot easier. Interestingly, criminals tend to support rabid gun control because laws only apply to the law-abiding.
Training, testing, and background check, all fully standardized CCW criteria, should apply for all applicants, regardless of who they are, or how important they are perceived to be. The current CCW "selective" process in CA and the handful of remaining CCW hold-out states is nothing short of Jim Crow.

Richard   Norco, CA

Posted: 12:10 am [PST] on April 01 2008

You should ask Sheriff Baca why he issues CCW's to actors and executive's

next 10

Full Disclosure Network®is a registered trademark of the American Association of Women and an electronic media and television production of the
Citizens Protection Alliance,
a 501(c)(3) tax exempt educational organization.

2008 © All Rights Reserved. Full Disclosure Network®
337 Washington Blvd., Suite #1, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel 310.822.4449 Fax: 310.919.2890

 

Site Meter