In Order of Appearance:

B. Scott Minerd, Chief Investment Officer, Guggenheim Partners

Don Mullinax. Inspector General, LA Unified School District

David Cartwright, Sr. Partner  O’Melveny & Meyers,  Outside Counsel LAUSD

Karen Sexton, Investigator, L A Unified School District

Steve Ipsen, L A County Prosecutor

Stan Interrante, International Catholic Broadcaster

Cardinal Roger Mahoney, Los Angeles Archidiocese

Sgt. Richard Valdemar, International Gang Specialist Los Angeles Sheriff’s Dept.  (ret)

Ron Kaye, Editor Los Angeles Daily News 1984-2008

Kevin DeLeon,  Calif. State Senator

Larry Flynt, Publisher and Candidate for Calfiornia Governor

Sheriff Leroy Baca, Los Angeles County

Steve Whitmore,  Sheriff’s Spokesman LASD

Debra Yang, United States Attorney (Los Angeles District)

Steve Yagman, Civil Rights Attorney

Nativo Lopez, President Mexican American Political Association

Sheriff Mike Carona, Orange County California

Orange County, CA .. The Full Disclosure Network® presents Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens, the National Rifle Association’s Ed Worley and , former OC Sheriff Lt. Bill Hunt in a video news report covering the new policy implemented by Sheriff Hutchins regarding issuing CCW’s in Orange County.

During the 15 minute video, citizen gun owners who attended a hearing before the Orange County Board of Supervisors testified their dissatisfaction with the Sheriff, a political appointee and her new policy. Many speakers suggested that she has her own agenda, is intending to impose the undesirable policies of Los Angeles County on the citizens of Orange County. The Board of Supervisors came under fire for having appointed someone who does not represent the concerns of the citizens.

Sheriff Hutchens stood her ground refuting the interpretation of her new policy saying “I do not see this as a Second Amendment Issue. The policy does not impact the right to have a gun at home or in a place of business.”

Bill Hunt, who is expected to challenge Sheriff Hutchens in the 2010 election was critical of Sheriffs and other Police Chief’s who do not share the fundamental beliefs in values held in the communities which they serve.

The following points were made during the citizen testimony:

• Why should permits be given only to those who transport large sums of money?
• Personal protection and family protection should be considered as primary issue
• Restricting use of Concealed Carry Weapon permits does not make the county safer.

Viewers are asked to participate in an opinion survey at the end of the video and to leave comments on the video blog for discussion.

Former County Prosecutor Steven J. Ipsen

Los Angeles, CA.  On February 19, 2013 an Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed with the  9^th Circuit Court of Appeals by former L A County Prosecutor Steven J. Ipsen  Exhibit 1 to the Writ describes the case.  On March 7, 2013 Chief Judge Alex Kozinski  of the 9^th Circuit and the US District Court Central District of California received an additional Emergency Application to Vacate the Court’s Orders in the same case involving the Civil Rights of Prosecutors who had been discriminated and retaliated against by their employer,  Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley, in the case first known as One Unnamed Deputy District Attorney , et al. v County of Los Angeles, DA Steve Cooley, et.al. (CV 09-7931 )

Reason To Disqualify Magistrate Judge Jay Gandhi ?

Magistrate Judge Jay Gandhi

The Writ of Mandate cites from “the Motion to Disqualify Judge Gandhi Dkt. No. 376, pages 2-6 paragraphs 1-7,9 and 15 with respect to Judge Gandhi’s actual adverse financial conflicts of interest and appearance of bias therefrom.  Further documentation is on Pages 15-22, which Magistrate Judge Gandhi’s prior law firm, prior to his nomination as a Magistrate Judge, had as its representative client the District Attorney’s Office of Los Angeles County, district Attorney Cooley and the County of Los Angeles, including discrimination and retaliatory litigation against Deputy District Attorneys similar to Petitioner Ipsen.”

Evidentiary Hearing To Examine Forged Court Docs, Fabrications and Conflicts

Bradley Gage, Esq.

The eighteen page application to Vacate the Court’s Orders filed on March 7, 2013, by former L A County Prosecutor Steve J. Ipsen, Esq. is seeking “an evidentiary hearing before a neutral U.S. District Court jurist and a Special Master appointed by 9^th Circuit Chief Judge Kozinski, to prove the conflicts of interest between Plaintiff Ipsen and his former attorneys, the forgery and fabrication of evidence by Mr. Bradley Gage in concert with the defendants, the alteration of the witness list by attorney Gage in concert with “the defendants”, and the conflicts of interest of Magistrate Judge Gandhi and Judge Dolly Gee, without limitation.”

Jones Day Law Firm Is Outside Counsel For Defendants

Elwood Lui
Jones Day

“The defendants” in this case are the County of Los Angeles and District Attorney Steve Cooley, who are represented by one of the most powerful law firms in the nation, Jones Day, whose senior partner, Elwood Lui (Bar State No. 45538) name appears at the top a seven page (Motion In Limine) to Bar Testimony Of Plaintiff’s Witness involved in the controversy.  Jones Day is a major outside legal contractor with the County of Los Angeles and the Superior Court of California.   Mr. Lui is a former Justice of the California Court of Appeals, Second District. Chairman of the Committee for the appointment of State and Federal Judges appointed by Senator Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and  he was the personal attorney for the L A County dealing with the case  Sturgeon vs County L.A. regarding the unauthorized  payments of over $350 million to L A judges by the County of L.A..Attorney’s Declaration Reveals Forgery, Collusion and Conflicts

Joseph Avrahamy. Esq.

Reply declaration concedes forgery, collusion and conflicts.  An astounding seven-page declaration dated February 19, 2013 filed with the U.S. District Court  by Ipsen’s attorney Joseph Avrahamy described attorney Bradley Gage as a Fiduciary, co-counsel for Mr. Ipsen,  “shortly before trial began Mr. Gage made several attempts to get Mr. Ipsen and me to sign a modified retainer agreement” and he noted that Mr. Gage sent over 100 E-mails to him and his client Steve Ipsen “to get him to reduce the size of his witness list and to eliminate witnesses that were important to his case.”

Declaration Connects the Dots To Corruption

According to the Emergency Ex-Application to Vacate Court Orders   “ Mr Bradley Gage further showed in his reply Declaration pages7-16 (filed February 25, 2013) that the defense counsel (Jones Day) jointly prepared the forged and fabricated stipulations and jointly filed them with the court, knowing in advance that Plaintiff’s counsel, Joseph Avrahamy, did not and would not have personally signed said stipulations and other documents that were forged and fabricated.”

WHAT IS THE REMEDY? 

Steve Cooley
L A District Attorney

Do you believe that 9^th Circuit Chief Judge Kozinski should appoint a special master to investigate forgery by high profile attorneys? and/or conspiracy to engage in forgery by attorneys acting in concert with the County of L A and former District Attorney Steve Cooley?     Yes or No?

The State Bar is apparently ignoring the evidence of misconduct by District Attorney Steve Cooley on this case.  Should they step in to use their disciplinary authority to punish or  disbar attorneys who are practicing unprofessional and illegal activity?  Yes or No?

Should the attorneys involved be permitted to hide behind the attorney client privilege when they submit forged documents to the court to obstruct the administration of justice to injure the opposing party Yes or No ?      Please leave your comments below.

Firearms Expert T.J. Johnston explains the confusion about what is and what is not an “assault weapon.” Giving a history of the California ban that threatens to spread across the nation into a another Federal ban, Johnston shows real firearms that clarify the different features that are banned by law. He also explains the lack of effect the California ban has had on crime.

Leslie Dutton, Ron Kaye (George Washington) and B. Scott Minerd

Marina del Rey, CA – Full Disclosure treated a capacity crowd to a celebration of George Washington’s birthday. The attendees watched a short video highlighting ”the First 20 Years”

Next was the keynote speaker, B. Scott Minerd, with his outstanding talk “Why George Washington Would Be Un-Electable Today”. You can read his entire speech by clicking HERE or see a short synopsis in the video below:

The next feature was a collection of trailers of current projects in the works at Full Disclosure. You can see the collection here:

The day came to an exciting climax with the arrival of George Washington himself, portrayed by former editor of the LA Daily News, Ron Kaye. Dressed in full Continental regalia, Mr. Kaye contrasted the qualities of the First President with the political officials who serve as our leaders today.

For Full Disclosure Insiders, you can watch the entire one-hour program in its entirety here:

If you’d like to become a Full Disclosure Insider, click here.

Here is a short video of his speech. For Full Disclosure Insiders, you can read the full transcrip by clicking the link below.

Transcript available

B. Scott Minerd

On President’s Day Weekend, Full Disclosure (R) presented “Remembering George Washington, the Father of our Country.” The theme of the program was to highlight the character of our First President and how different he was from today’s politicians. Keynote speaker B. Scott Minerd spoke about the qualities of the man that were so essential for bringing the new country out from under the British tyranny to a new form of government, never tried before in the history of mankinds.

As a surprise for the audience, former long-time editor of the LA Daily News Ron Kaye came out dressed in full Continental regalia, and spoke to the audience as General Washington, capturing the difference between the leaders of today and what was intended by the founders of our country.

You can watch a brief video of these two inspirational speakers here:

America’s First President George Washington has sent a video message to Americans about the perils and pitfalls that have enveloped the country since its founding in 1776 following the Declaration of Independence.   The message is presented in person, Washington impersonator and long-time news Editor Ron Kaye at gala event hosted by the Full Disclosure Network at the California Yacht Club on President’s Day weekend.  Mr. B. Scott Minerd, Chief Investment Officer of Guggenheim Partners was the Keynote Speaker whose presentation set the stage for the former President’s grand entrance and described George Washington’s vision and determination to establish the new country.

See the inciteful presentation here:

Public Access Television is establishing a foot-hold in Long Beach, a suburb of Los Angeles. But is it really “public access” with the freedom of expression that was established by the initial format allowing all citizens to air their opinions?

Preview

634 Segment 1

Darick Simpson suggests that he and his agency can be trusted to run the Long Beach public access television channel in the best interest of the community. But he emphasizes that his Community Action Partnership will have a leading program on his channel.

634 Segment 2

Seeing the end of funding for the public access station on the horizon is only two years away, Darick Simpson has had his CAP agency hire a fund-raising specialist.  Producers Lynn Brennan and Michael Blevins from the nearby city of Torrance have learned first-hand how the so-called public access channels can control content, when they are under the control of government officials.

634 Segment 3

Who will control public access television? In Long Beach, Darick Simpson is attempting to establish an Advisory Board to set the policies and controls. Jim Worsham, the President and CEO of the Long Beach Community Foundation who also represents the James L. Knight Foundation. These two organizations were responsible for making the funding available to Darick Simpson. Will they have the authority to direct the Advisory Board regarding which programs will be suitable and acceptible?