Los Angeles, CA Former U.S. Prosecutor Richard I. Fine, Ph.D describes the latest court battle against corruption and his campaign to regain his license to practice law. Fine names names of the most powerful judicial and State Bar officials who he alleges have conspired to undermine the justice system with corrupt practices by taking illegal payments from L A County government, who almost NEVER loses cases in the courts. Fine was jailed for 18 months in solitary "Coercive Confinement" without being charged or convicted of a crime following his attempt to disqualify Judge David Yaffe who unexpectedly released him and then resigned from office before his term ended.
Since early 2000 attorney Richard Fine has been fighting judicial abuse of power. In his campaign t to restore integrity to the Justice system, Dr. Fine has filed a First Amended Complaint in Federal Court (California Central District) Case No. 10-cv-0048 alleging the circumstances where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials, Los Angeles County government officials and lawyers for the developers who opposed him in the courtroom.
Richard Fine alleges that the officials named in his complaint have participated in unconstitutional acts and tactics, removing him from cases for the purpose of seeking favorable court decisions for themselves and the County that was paying them illegally. The four causes of action in his complaint are
- Declare unconstitutional California's Moral Turpitude Law that is abused and misused for illegal purposes.
- Declare unconstitutional the State Bar practice of "Involuntary Inactive Enrollment" of Licensed Attorneys who are given no notice of actions against them.
- Declare unconstitutional the Senate Bill SBX2 11 that gave retroactive criminal immunity to judges and government officials who were involved in the misappropriation of public funds and resulted in the illegal payment of $350 million to Superior Court Judges in L.A, County who never disclosed to the litigants in the court room that the payments were made to them by L.A. County, a party to litigation in cases before them.
- To Declare and to enjoin the State Bar and all of the Defendants from taking any action against Richard Fine with respect to their having disbarred him based upon the fact that the Supreme Court Judges violated the law and engaged in corruption by having received illegal payments from L A County.
Segment 1 Complaint Names Judges, State Bar Officials
Former U S Prosecutor Richard Fine describes his court battle to restore integrity to the California Justice system. His court complaint names some of the highest Court and Legal Officials who are involved in the corruption. The actual Court Documents that describe the high level corruption are available free online here.
Segment 2 Judges Violating Laws Against Bribery On
According the former U S Prosecutor Richard I Fine, California Judges are violating the Intangible Right To Honest Services that says you cannot take a bribe. Fine goes on to say that "under California law L A County payments to Judges are considered to be a bribe and considered to be obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice and the Judges are required to pay the money back". In his complaint Fine's alleges two State Bar Presidents whose law firms were representing developers and L A County against Richard Fine and his clients, but never disclosed this information during the disbarment proceedings.
Segment 3 California State Bar-County Conflicts
Richard Fine alleges there were major conflicts not disclosed by members of the State Bar Board of Governors and the State Bar Judge during the course of his disbarment proceedings, . In the video he describes his allegations of a money trail from developers to the County Supervisors who approved developments with illegal votes, then gave illegal money to the judges who then decide in favor of LA county and the developers.
Comments to date: 19. This is page 1 of 2.
Pat Hamer California
Posted: 09:00 am [PST] on November 27 2011
I am outraged that I can work hard my whole life and one corrupt official can destroy everything, to cover up malfeasance, even when they get caught red handed. The "code of silence" are the witnesses who can stop this, but they fear retaliation themselves. Until retaliation becomes criminal, corruption will live undaunted.
There is no right to redress, as we know! Congo has no right of assembly, do we? Let's see...
The First Amendment is a fable and does not exist. Hatred exists and there is an amendment that supports hatred and that amendment is the 11th amendment. This is because it immunizes U.S. citizens from liability for negligence and crime unequally, in violation of the body of the Constitution. Look at Congo, there police kill protesters as do are police, let’s examine the difference.
Re: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/26/4080996/congo-2-killed-in-clashes-days.html
Congo police “murdering protestors” represents speech retaliation in foreign countries whose citizens cannot claim the “constitutional protections” that the U.S.A. citizens have. Yet if you look at this incident, and look at what is going on in response to “protests” in the U.S.A., you will see no difference exists in the United States, other than Congo citizens are not living under the delusion that they have a right to assemble, or First Amendment type protection. This difference supports the delusion created in fallacies of logic, most of us pass off as “smoke and mirrors” as if there is no actual basis to stop it. The reality is that the belief by the majority of U.S. Citizens that U.S.A. government officials respect “free speech” and the right to “assemble” or to protest under the First (Suggestion) Amendment is not plausible on the face of facts, where the news media fail to address this immunity. Media misconstrue it as a normal uncontroversial issue, when the First Amendment “freedom of speech,” “assembly” is well understood by fifth as a fallacy called an “inalienable right.” This is evident by the overt unfolding of facts in the treatment of protesters; hence, the stigmatized uneducated Cesar Chavez park protesters, contrasted to the “white glove” treatment of the educated Davis students” who are allowed to set up “tent city” on the campus but denied to the Chavis park protestors. It doesn’t take rocket science to show that equal justice has no intention to equate, and protest is useless to redress this. The Constitution is not confusing, and it is deductively powerful allowing the use of algebra by putting an equal sign in between two set of facts and if they “are not equal to” they are not facially plausible, thus, it violates the Constitution. Well the Davis/Chavis protest shows this, so which way do we lean?
The Kent State massacre resulted in a civil rights “abuse of power” law suit by the families of the students legally murdered, who were just going to class and not actually part of the protest. The result was that because, the state police killers “"fired their weapons in the honest and sincere belief,” they were protected under the 11th amendment because, “action was against the State of Ohio and barred by the Eleventh Amendment,” see http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/640/640.F2d.214.79-3202.79-3115.html
To this day, a phenomenon exists in the U.S.A. that most of its citizens believe that they have freedom from government abuse and a right to “redress a grievance,” contrary to other governments. Propaganda unquestioned by journalists who are barred from personal use of rhetoric skewing logic arises when enforced by news medias ability to retaliate against journalists who report disgraceful news that undermines the current “regimes” agenda. Press monopoly under a few conglomerates simplify the process to punishment reporters who are considered detrimental to a political agenda when their favored officials face securitization. Hearst/Argile for example can create policy to weaken the free press ability to deter political entities from public scrutiny across the nation, and nothing can be done about. It was argued that the press corp. was made impotent by a case called New York Times v. Sullivan (1964). The court was able to reign in objective media using the “malice standard” as a means to bring a once “sovereign press” into the grasp of local or retaliatory jurisdictional admonishment in the form of surreptitious by forcing the press to overlook certain political activities that may be corrupt are draw speculation or heat to political parties in power. This is a well engineered process designed to cultivate out of due process the power of the press to deter by ad Populum scrutiny. Prior to Sullivan, the press had no deterrence from accusing officials of corruption where the 11th amendment protected even the guilty ones. Basically this undermines the power of the 11th amendment, which actually was the stated, “power of the electorate” if educated could vote out abusive officials, only if the press would report this abuse. This is stated in Bogan, supra. Sullivan subjects the press to limitations to justice that were out of the reach of the Eleventh Amendment immunity, which “sets aside” First Amendment power. This is a very clever orchestrated event that couldn’t happen out of coincidence as easily if the planets in our solar system could align. It is not improper to draw an inference from a remaining obstacle preventing punishment of public officials who behave badly. If the press aided the attack on favored officials caught violating abuse of power laws, it could weaken official sovereign power. Therefore, in order to prevent the Constitution from weakening their “constitutionally protected” power to protect their own possibility of incompetence, negligence, and god forbid arbitrarily abuse, silencing the press eliminates public scrutiny by the press, where judicial “abuse of power” had no reach prior to Sullivan.
At minimum, it protects officials who simply made a negligence mistake, but the argument is that criminal minded sociopaths can make honest livings in this realm without penalty.
For instance, if you run for a Judge position, it is impossible to violate 42 USC 1983, “abuse of power under the color of law” as long as you are wearing your robe in your court, see Stump v. Sparkman, among other cases. Thus, the court allows themselves to abuse power, simply by changing the word “power” to “discretion.” The malice standard, has removed the “freedom of the press” using stari decisis that didn’t exist as stari decisis unethically and ironically allowing judicial abuse of power as the final coup de gras so the 11th amendment no longer stood on its own, and now included removing the power of the press. Thus, the modern day press, and journalists, are now the same evil goons as those in Germanys pre holocaust propaganda machine. That press would willingly acquiesce to cover their governments, forget civil or human right abuse, but actual ethnic cleansing and mass murder for a meager paycheck. Similarly our press are only allowed to express the propaganda and enforce the suppression of culpable facts, similar to that which was allowing the holocaust to go on without obligation to inform society. If you notice, the media are the first to white wash official malfeasance, or police brutality, as if they are witnesses testifying in a trial, contrary to objective reporting of facts.
Those in journalism who turn a blind eye to this are literary sociopaths paid to cover up this creation of a utopian livelihood enjoyed by officials in an engineered plutocracy where, ironically, capitalism has become the benefit of socialistic bureaucracy indistinguishable financially from capitalism. Though this description may seem absurd, and can only be maintained by very clever manipulation of fallacy, which for several thousand years, has caused Aristotle undying fame for explaining the basis allowing absurdity to exist in the presence of educated men who are duped by these fallacies of logic and accept them without question. No elaborate concerted modern conspiracy need exist to support this abuse of power, as the “doctrine of immunity” is the devil buried subtly in the details.” This was first codified by Bartolus Sassofferotus during the foolish paradigms that condemned those who followed Copernicus, or criticized inquisitions based upon guilty parties not succumbing to drowning as a determination of guilt. Yet the Doctrine of Immunity illogical tyranny managed to preserve the sanctity of protecting modern day nobles from their incompetence or perversions against society. Today we call this the 11th amendment, and I find that the average and even above average thinkers are not aware of the basis or the cause and affect that is retarding the development of civil humanity.
The First Amendment due to amendments is now inert. If it was actually removed verbally from the Constitution it would actually be unnoticed in regards to any concerted Government abuse. The First Amendment is useless to obstruct the formulation of policy or obstruct retaliatory arbitrary abuse committed by the very worse minion type officials that nepotism or other influence peddling that allow and cultivate the interference of constitutional rights. The wording is left intact go avoid reality from setting in, but several amendments have stripped it from the constitution, thus removing the verbiage would have no substantial legal affect.
Pointing out this phenomenon in argument is subject to the “conspiracy theory” stigma, but it is cogent and must be taken seriously! Citizen inaction is deplorable. The fact that very educated people or the press could make a difference is left unanswered, because there is no debate, beyond this type of information process. Nevertheless, the press in a lot of cases, is suppressing this outward attack to preserve as a constitutional right, the power to abuse citizens without liability which will be the downfall of our country.
Abuse of discretion, is criminal and is supposed to put in prison those who offend when they violate Title 18 USC 242, for Abuse of Power. Our legal system allows fallacy to immunize offenders of this law from liability by granting them sovereign power to influence prima facie cases otherwise designed to reinstate financially, the damages done to citizen victims abused by government officials. Their motive for misconstruing facts of the damage has the affect of preserving tax dollars being awarded by Jury’s to abused citizens. Citizens who are no victims of abuse rally around this obstruction out of envy to prevent citizens from “capitalizing” on the damages that victims typically get to restore damages, and deter future abuse. Its as if this phenomenon has its own fail safe mechanism that causes citizens to rally around the weakening of civil rights by aiding corruption in a syndrome similar to “Stockholm syndrome.” Quiet perplexing but no suprize. The Germans call this type an “envy or “schadenfreud” when others take joy in the demise of others by aiding in the injustice that causes the demise.
Instead of removing the laws that should stop government abuse, the courts remove existing corruption laws, see recent 18 USC 1346, made useless. When all else fails, Supreme Court precedence is overcome by district court nullification, and there is no penalty or punishment to deter it. The District court simply “misconstrues” the complainant’s facts like magic, into non-actionable claims as if made by the unfavored party. This is done on paper and undeniable proof, but there is no crime against it do to changing the word “power” to excusable “discretion.” On paper, this satisfies layman or press surface inquiry very quickly. Otherwise, to remove the laws from the books would create a populace outcry. “Misconstruing” is none other than the use of two thousand year old concept of Fallacy, such as “red herring” or “straw man,” among other fallacies taught in logic to enable in argument the ability of the arguer magically attract popularity through deception. Misconstruing, in a future paradigm, if justice is the objective, will replace the word fraud, but for now, misconstruing is a “protected constitutional right” judges have for themselves, even if they are caught. Misconstruing facts is ground for reversal used by appellate courts when they catch district courts that nullify the Supreme Court precedent. There is no punishment for this nullification when it can be inferred from facts as overt fraud, and “inferences drawn from the record,” are excusable abuse of discretion by civil code of procedure statute. So if your case is disfavored, or even surreptitiously bribed, you lose, and your only hope is years of misery fighting corruption which is a futile endeavor in the United States by citizens. We all know you can’t fight city hall, another fallacy controlling cowards and idiots of society.
The point is that when the government acts in ways that hold private businesses to the scrutiny of civil liability in civil courts, and they are not treated equally. This violates the fundamental inalienable right of “equality” in the body of the Constitution. Apparently, that is why we have the 14th amendment. This amendment allows a Judge to commit fraud by “misconstruing” facts to set aside any right that barred the government from acting, prior to the 11th amendment. The Constitution was written under the assumption that officials would “make no law…” regarding the First Amendment. Yet we see volumes of “law made” prohibiting, “assembly,” peaceful non-fire in a theater,” speech. Why? Who knows, but U.S. citizens cannot mentally process, “make no law” as “make no law.” It is unbelievable and embarrassing, but true. Because the 11th amendment and 14th amendment reinstated what the Declaration of Independence called “the right inestimable and formidable to tyrants,” we know that right to be the power to escape justice. Though the Declaration named “Mock Trials” as a cause of action, we see that the 11th amendment, and the 14th amendment, inappropriately allow “Mock Trials” to manipulate facts by misconstruing them, nothing really changed, except our leaders cannot have a captor or wear a crown. I hope I have explained this in simple enough terms. What is the argument that defends this phenomenon that goes unnoticed by society that calls itself free? I know it, do you?
Placing my rhetoric in forums draws a plethora of attacks stemming from ad hominem abuse, where my facts are never attacked, and if so, merely misunderstood surface attacks as Supreme Court decisions explaining the meaning of statutes have not been used to qualify the statute which rarely stands alone. I am usually stigmatized by mob mentality in some negative way, as the basis for their position, usually that my argument is unpatriotic or anti government/police. In reality, I argue for better government simply by claiming that there should be some deterrence in the form of personal liability like the rest of us must endure! Engaging in public service for a living is no different than a person engaging in private business. Protection from liability would only require an insurance premium that contractors or doctors have to own in order to practice their trades. Public employees can kill you negligently and there is no deterrence contrary to common law that was supported by the premises in the Declaration of Independence, which was the basis for our Constitution. Private commerce is denied equality because public service commerce is set up in a utopian idealistic base where there is no negligence inappropriately unequal and in violation to the equal protection doctrine. In forum’s people are not here to learn but comment, and some get offended by my information that reveals or points to traditionally accetped fallacy. Nevertheless, I do get some very good responses that compliment my research on abuse of power, as I usually back up my claims with facts that are easily verified.
Abuse of power claims stem from what is called “animus” or motive. Speech can cause officials to retaliate. Usually arbitrary denial of due process against the speaker can occur if they "blow the whistle." Retaliation is easily perpetrated by officials who understand they are protected by the 11th amendment, and this is willful malice or treble damages in a civil suit, but no worries, a victim of government abuse will never see it. Official power abusers have no reason if they have no moral conscience for self-discipline from punishing you with arbitrary denial of honest intangible services for challenging their god like authority.
Citizens get into hot water trying to redress this, a so called right, that creates the tort of “intentional infliction of emotional distress,” which is assumed which in other countries, has no redress right, thus was a catalyst of our revolution, and that is why free speech is among the First Amendment! What I am trying to convey is that officials have a constitutional right to be protected for committing “intentional emotional distress” and they are given a constitutional right to cause this distress. It is absurd! If you attempt to redress, the courts heap more distress on you for in violation of the very act, and they always keep a straight face an utter absurdity while they call it an inalienable right? There is no cogent argument or rebuttal to suggest I am off my rocker for insisting on my argument as true. I am only writing in an alarmist manner because the Supreme Court has stated my premises in a single sentence with Bogan v. Scott-Harris in 1998 when they stated, “...the law will not tolerate an action to redress the individual wrong which may have been done.'' Id., at 599.4.” As long as the 11th amendment exists, it will not be over-ruled! If you do not agree, where is your argument? Is it argument ad patriotic? In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king, and the king has immunity!
Notice in Bogan that they used the word “law.” It is reversible, and not stated in the Constitution. This is law derived from an ethics violation of judicial canon that immunizes themselves for violating the First Amendment, therefore unjust. With irony, I observe that just about every citizen of the United States, either is unaware of this phenomenon or perhaps they do not have the comprehension to understand what has happened. Using a hypothetical syllogism, If what I am saying is happening, then in reality there is no First Amendment. Therefore, is there a patriotic honor that exists for being a U.S. citizen? Is it anymore special or beneficial to the promotion of human rights for a better world? Is there an agenda for a world court to adopt actual reliance on a government that can punish its leaders, and what leader would allow their decisions to be judged by those they are accused of abusing? Can a government exist without immunizing officials from negligence or corruption? So far, humanity has never experienced this, other than from the time of 1776 thru 1795 where our nation experimented in government without Sovereign Tyrannical power. This freedom was silently ended without any peep from even a mouse! That amazes me! What do you think about this phenomenon? I call I the most diabolical coup to freedom, never told! There is a frontier still open in social science to achieve a more civilized society by ending “sovereign power” the best kept secret in the world of the blue bloods, and those they share it with.
We all we brag that humans flock to the U.S.A. for a better life. Do they come for a form of abuse that is less harsher than their former abuse? Is abuse under Title 18 USC 242 that exists here justify abuse as more humane? Is our abuse the less of two evils? Is abuse acceptable if it undercuts harsher abuse? Perhaps, immigrants are not seeking freedom from abuse, but financial benefits, with a knowledge that as long as they suppress political speech, their assets will not be jeopardized by exercising the fallacy of the delusion of believing there is a first amendment! Very little information is made public on the 11th amendment and its basis--the Doctrineof Immunity. The late Andy Rooney never wondered why government employees could skew justice, I wonder why?
krkikyv gnCwjklhdO
Posted: 04:40 am [PST] on November 07 2011
jhxIRO , [url=http://gtcnclpqyygc.com/]gtcnclpqyygc[/url], [link=http://jlvjmhwsczxf.com/]jlvjmhwsczxf[/link], http://mprwgmjcwwia.com/
jwfpuce bsvylwklOUyrRFgogke
Posted: 03:27 am [PST] on November 05 2011
Kxmwh7 awpcckwlhcyt
xlcmvtzgsq GoGaHfow
Posted: 05:59 am [PST] on November 03 2011
EAszfU , [url=http://iiifbptovmmw.com/]iiifbptovmmw[/url], [link=http://dszqilwkruek.com/]dszqilwkruek[/link], http://axvmaeycyxfm.com/
utsculu DoDsAexHGrKCNL
Posted: 07:30 am [PST] on November 02 2011
iNl2RX kyfztegkxref
R. Menna http://www.landlordheaven.org
Posted: 11:25 am [PST] on August 04 2011
.
WHEN IN DOUBT, VOTE THEM OUT !!!
Vote out EVERY INCUMBENT until you find one who’s ONLY CONCERN is cleaning up judicial corruption. NO OTHER ISSUE MATTERS because the courts are the ones who enforce all other anti-corruption efforts and obviously these will fail if they are “enforced” by corrupt cronies. So long as government is corrupt, everything will keep getting worse for everyone else (except the special interests).
This is the ONLY WAY to nullify the power of special interests.
Even if the replacements are corrupt and incompetent, HOW MUCH MORE HARM CAN THEY DO IN ONE TERM? If they ALL then get voted out, ALL politicians who want to get re-elected will positively realize that the only way to keep their cushy job is to absolutely CONVINCE their constituents that their ONLY CONCERN is cleaning up judicial corruption. Otherwise, constituents with the slightest DOUBT will VOTE THEM OUT.
Once the panicked politicians get enough crooked judges replaced by HONEST judges, citizens can then accelerate the cleanup process by using the courts to enforce laws against governmental wrongdoing.
Thereafter, hopefully, office seekers will realize that voters’ hotbutton issue is eliminating and PREVENTING corruption and will compete with incumbents in finding ways to accomplish this. If this happens, checks and balances will reasonably quickly be implemented thereby making future corruption much harder and less likely.
The state can then get on with actually improving the quality of life for its citizens instead of enslaving them for the benefit of a few.
.
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell Niagara Falls, NY
Posted: 04:08 pm [PST] on July 22 2011
06 June 2007
Judicial Corruption Continues To Plague the World, Report Says
Social order, economic growth suffers when justice fails
By Jaroslaw Anders
Staff Writer
Washington -- Systemic corruption of judicial systems not only denies citizens their basic human rights, but hinders economic development and sometimes pushes aggrieved populations to violence, according to a recent report.
Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems says that despite international efforts, different forms of judicial corruption continue to afflict many parts of the world. The report was issued in late May by Transparency International, an international anti-corruption nongovernmental organization.
“We are talking not just about outright bribery, but political bias or interference, the influence of money, which can have a profound impact on all of us, undermining our trust in public institutions and their capacity to deliver fair and impartial outcomes,” said Nancy Boswell, the president of Transparency International-USA. She spoke June 6 at an event at the Brookings Institution, a private research organization in Washington.
According to the report, there is a clear connection between high levels of judicial corruption and low levels of economic growth. This comes as no surprise, the report says, since “the expectation that contracts will be honored and disputes resolved fairly is vital to investors, and underpins sound business development and growth.”
Speaking at the same event, Aryeh Neier said widespread mistrust of the institutions of justice also is one of the factors that push citizens to resolve their grievances through the use of force, leading to social disorder and violence. Neier is the president of the Open Society Institute, a private group that promotes democratic governance, human rights, and economic, legal, and social reform.
According to Transparency International, a majority of people in seven of the eight African countries it polled said their legal systems are corrupt and one among five of those who had dealt with courts admit to paying bribes. Another aspect of judicial corruption -- political influence over the judiciary -- is especially serious in Niger, Nigeria, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the organization says. In addition, it cites Kenya and Lesotho as countries with high level of social tolerance for corrupt practices.
In Latin America, 80 percent or more of respondents in Bolivia, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru perceive their judiciary systems as corrupt.
Governments in many low-income countries in Asia -- including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam -- are not providing adequate support for their courts and court officials, “inviting corruption and undermining the rule of law,” the report says.
In Europe and Central Asia, the report cites what it considers undue influence of the executive branch on judicial appointments in countries such as Azerbaijan, Croatia and Turkey. The report also concludes that Russia and Georgia have been backsliding on international standards of judicial independence.
*The report also looks critically at the United States, citing a 2004 poll that showed that more than 70 percent of U.S. respondents believe contributions to U.S. judicial campaigns influence judicial decisions in the states in which judges are chosen through elections.
The report points out that judicial and political corruption tend to reinforce each other. A corrupt judicial system is unlikely to sanction people who bribe and threaten politicians. As a result, “honest and unfettered candidates” often are prevented from entering politics or succeeding in public life.
But Susan Rose-Ackerman, a law professor at Yale University and one of the authors of the report, cautioned that judiciary independence is not enough to guarantee impartial justice. “You can certainly have independent judges who are acting with impunity, who are lazy, corrupt, but are completely independent: they can do what they want because nobody can control them,” she said.
The report calls for a delicate balance between judicial independence and accountability. On the one hand, constitutional and legal mechanisms must protect judges from political pressure; on the other, judicial officials should not be permitted to “shelter behind outdated immunity provisions, draconian contempt laws, or notions of collegiality,” the document states.
The full text of the report is available on the Transparency International Web site.
For more information, see Bribery and Corruption.
I might as well die with dignity: The dignity of speaking “truth to power!”
The above “report” (what is here and available for much of us), speaks of U.S Judicial Corruption in terms of campaign contributions, and is oriented around such. [T] he facts are:
1. United States of America’s Judicial Corruption is around the daily happenings in the United States Courts.
2. The Majority of the Corruption appear to have been initiated at the District Court level, where Federal Judges low on the totem pole, or hierarchy…people suffering from inferiority complexes; and Gangster ignorance Syndrome (GIS) such as the Chief Judge Steven McAuliffe, of the Concord New Hampshire District Court ; a man who may have well been your ordinary street hoodlum except he was fortunate to have graced some academic institution…of-course we know that many of those who cut the children out of the wombs of mothers, many of those committing rapes, and murder in Nazi Germany, intelligent degreed people who rose to high distinction (whether deserved, or the unfortunate calamity of a family situation)…were and are nevertheless seen for what they are: Indeed this Judge and wanna be God McAuliffe has for years persecuted (like the Nazis) little children (and their families) children who came into the world (through no fault of their own) with varying degrees of handicaps. In the case of my son, he HAD a speech problem which is genetic.
3. Before I stray too far from the topic at hand, I would like to pay homage to the following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xR7g41_4758&playnext=1&list=PL2E79B358E4801D23
Here we see basic truths of America, and the Republic for which it stands. We see dear public, the lies….layers, and layers, and layers of filth: of Corruption un-stoppable by old people upon the Courts who ought to know better, but instead of wisdom with age, these vagabonds, these devils, these tax evaders and cheats; (and I doubt that Clarence Thomas is the only Liar, the only tax-evading crook…who use(s) use(d) use(s) his wife to steal and not report millions of dollars $$$$$$$...after he got his buddies to walk this way….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B_UYYPb-Gk these robber barons of goodness; these nefarious and hollow cloaks of superficial waste of the nether ends and their collaborators spend much time discussing the dancing pins on various dicky heads…phony big-headed intellectuals, Korrupt degenerate WHORES!
The very sad thing is, the average Joe in the street do not see these con artist, these worthless criminals: Joe and Mary are so busy trying to earn a living that they are consistently blind. And, here it is:
When the very people who are entrusted to ensure the Holy tenets of the American Constitution, and elements of an idea handed down via the Magna Carta…when a country which boasts of its human rights record and points fingers at countries such as Iraq, North Korea, China and Afghanistan for example…when their dirty little secret is exposed…this big lie, the battered and tattered wholes of the land –of-the-free, is rendered vulnerable, the statues and language of the Constitution is now impotent; the bill of rights…romantic rhetoric meant as statuesque symbols de propaganda guiding and edging on the masses in tow:
What is left are hundreds and thousands of people; millions of people grind down like meat, spat on and swat like flies in a decaying morass…standing around licking up the their wounds and praying to these honored gods for salvation, while being mocked and scorned and jeered in the auditorium’s sport of fun!
It is clear, very clear that the laws are not applicable to the judiciary in America and this can be elucidated and recited in conclusionary law, time and time again!
It is this “antiquity” of a superior experiment baked in one man, one vote-- innocent until proven guilty… Mirandized De Due processione, with precedent your honored holiness: And we the subjects, we march and echo; we follow in righteous soliloquies blaspheming one Hitler as none other could be so a tyrant; none other could so traumatized and hypnotically entrench…and here it is, right before our eyes in candied decrees of intellectual loftiness---and as you are marionette hither and thither, do laugh and jeer and sneer, and say:
You fool, you ignorant proletarian snots of boogers, the law is not meant for you, and you and you! For you are not the keepers of this system of economics, politics and society…you lower-class heathens! You worker ant-drones...STEP IN LINE! STEP IN LINE!
You, you are confuse dear children your duty is to vote, (and we sometimes select); but yours is a righteous calling! Tis A noble one indeed! But thinking and governing was never gotten with you in mind! For an orderly society, some duties must be dispersed of in such a way, that each ant knows his/her calling! You are the chorus, the heightened masses of cheerleading: Do you honestly believe that Capitalism could afford Democracy, due process and the like? There, there; now you see: The experiment full of holes, and always there must be leaders, and doers, the anointed and the followers, the head, and the tails: Be content, for there is no other way out, we’ve got you surrounded and millions of ready-made coffins; and you who ran hither, we will seek out, just ask Gary Webb!
[The brave soul]: And now me dear friends, it does come down to those naturale Rights vs. the Right of revolution! If ye be intimidated and not raise your voice against the enemy robber-baron, well then, ye deserve yur Oligarchs, but tis said here, right here in our “Dec du Inpendence” Natural rights, including a right of revolution.
It is clear, so very clear that the American judiciary engages in the vilest deprivations of human rights, homeland bound: It steals the innocence and belief; it pretends.
“The Court can bring true justice but only if it approaches each case without predisposition or bias.”
___ Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
Did Justice Breyer approach my case without predisposition or bias? But this is rhetorical isn’t it?
Our Supreme Court is supposed to live within the law, the Justices on that Court are supposed to be governed by the Constitution, they’re not supposed to govern the Constitution and that’s the point that I am making.”
____ (Senator Orin Hatch)
Were the Justices governed by the Constitution in my case? Did they live within the law? Was the Constitution governed?
It is clear, very clear that I am a walking time-bomb. Here in a “freedom-loving” society, I remain put out from the protections of the law! This is so in NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND NOW MARYLAND!
MARYLAND OFFICIALS DO NOT HAVE TO RESPOND TO ME, BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE EXAMPLE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT! IT IS OK TO TREAT ELIZABETH J. CAMPBELL DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE, SHE HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Maryland owes her no answers and can afford to be contradictory in terms and conditions because although she has been living here since 1975, and although she has not been officially charged with terrorists acts, her refusal to withdraw her complaint comes under the Patriot Homeland Security Act. She is guilty of crimes against the State!
LIKEWISE HER SON, HE HAS NO RIGHTS!
The collaborative program in place is designed to ensure that Campbell stands out, and in, simultaneously! Kincaid is retained to make sure that any remnants of rights Campbell once enjoyed are non-existent!
Elizabeth J. Campbell is guilty of the crime of not withdrawing her IDEA and Constitutional rights, despite being warned by a school district attorney, and now 8 Federal Judges, 2 main Supreme Court Justices, and the collaborative efforts of 6 other Supreme Court Justices!
ALL OF THESE LEARNED PEOPLE CANNOT BE WRONG! Elizabeth Campbell is, the only wrong person here, and is guilty of perverting and subverting American law: She is therefore sentenced to Gitmo justice!
A….is for Adulterer
G…is for Gitmorer
Well, it is reminiscent of Salem!
Of-course I am now residing in Niagara Falls New York, as Kincaid under the cover of Justice Breyer (Justice for New Hampshire) makes sure that my son and I remain homeless: WE HAVE BEEN HOMELESS 6 TIMES IN 2 YEARS. REMEMBER, I HAVE COMMITTED NO CRIME MY NURSING LICENSE HAS EXPIRED AND BECAME EXTINCT, AND THIS JEW WITH HISTORICAL ROOTS TO WORLD-WIDE HATE HAS NOT LEARNED THE LESSON. I SUPPOSE WHEN 3 OF YOU ARE ON THE MOST POWERFUL COURT IN THE WORLD MAKING UP THE MAJORITY…NAZISM, INQUSITION, AND BURNING CIMBERS WOULD, COULD NOT COME BACK: BUT WHAT LED UP TO JEWISH HATRED IN GERMANY? WHY DID HITLER BECOME SO POPULAR?
JUSTICE BREYER, STEPHEN BREYER, THE NEW NAZI! BADDER THAN
ADOLPH!
MY CRIME? THE SUPREME COURT SAID 3 MONTHS BEFORE I ACCESSED THE CONCORD NH COURT OF STEPHEN McAULIFFE VIA THE WINKLEMAN DECISION THAT PARENTS HAVE A RIGHT UNDER IDEA TO TAKE UP THEIR CHILD’S CASE AS THEIR OWN…I, YES THIS NEGRO Elizabeth Juanita Campbell did just that, because they took my former attorney Raymond Foss off this case assisting my son (they were afraid too since Muirhead who played a dual role said that the Hooksett NH School District had violated over 50 statues in this case) Kincaid could not let a Negro win…you know, the Constitution is not really for those people, those 3/5ths>here comes John Roberts “I’ve always known and believe that the Constitution is only, and was only (according to our forefathers) only theoretically applicable to Niggers”!
Stephen Breyer the wonderful Liberal, the doo-goooder so desperate is he to be a member of this not so WASP club, that he condones, and is actually taking part in the destruction of me, and an innocent child who has not been enrolled in school for the past 3 years, despite my feeble attempts at doing so!
And so we return to the continuous Lies, and projections of the American media which after-all is in bed with the Korrupt Justices and Judges: A worthless and disgusting institution in America that is slowly-slowly demoralizing and alienating the entire society.
America can clean up things beginning with the cesspool bunch presently adorning Black in D.C. An OVER-WHELMING RECALL! Boy they stinketh!
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell Niagara Falls, NY
Posted: 05:49 pm [PST] on July 20 2011
This is my last entry. Justice Breyer has already hired some one to murder me..
Elizabeth Juanita campbell Niagara falls NY
Posted: 11:35 am [PST] on July 15 2011
It is patently unfair to call out Rupert Murdock for hacking into accounts (via his papers) while ignoring the disgusting and pervading account hacking of Justice Stephen Breyer: Stephen Breyer has given Jeanne M. Kincaid the right to take over my email accounts, and in so doing, he has gone along with the porn and death threats, the U.S mail interception, and the Chronic job loss I have been faced with since 2006.
Of-course I am not the only victim here, I have a 14 year old son, who was 10 years old when the violence started in New Hampshire, because I have steadfastly refused to withdraw my rights. Clearly the District Court lost Subject Matter jurisdiction when I complained to the Court of the procedural and substantial violations, but all the Magistrate Judge James Muirhead, and Chief Judge Steven McAuliffe would do, was to ignore the racism. We are Negroes!
You see I had an attorney, Raymond Foss who was removed from assisting us by the Chief Judge, after the magistrate Judge (he served a dual purpose) listed in excess of 50 violations of the Hooksett Memorial School. I took up the case, and would not back down, meeting porn, death threats and chronic unemployment with the interception of my U.s mail all the way to the Supreme Court (including the Boston First Circus Court under lea Lynch chief Judge)!
The United States Supreme court ruled on a void case, a case devoid of jurisdiction…such is the corruption and immoral disgust at Courts in America…far worse than that of Afghanistan, N Korea, China etc. They are now destroying my son’s life. He has been stopped from being enrolled in school, and Justice Breyer by the use of Kincaid will not let me get an apartment to provide stability for myself and son! My son is depressed, and Kincaid threatens me that if I take him to a therapist, that she would have access to his records and she would cause the therapist to leave! We are living in a first world cess-pool for a country a country that routinely lies before the world body: A country that is involved in the mass wire-tapping of its citizens; a country that exists only as a utopian dream.
It is shameful and disgusting that Justice Breyer who is Jewish, who is well aware of centuries of inquisition, and recently Nazism, that he would be a shining light of ethics and morality….and all over the internet he projects this aura, when in-fact, he is an evil, sick, disgusting liar: He is a fascist piggy, and probably was spurned from the background of Jews who kept other Jews in-line at the various death camps across Germany!
Here we have 3 Jews for the First time at the highest spheres of the American judicial realm, and what are we getting? Nothing but corruption, and guttural cesspool and immoral behavior none of the other two would step in to right any wrongs…[t]he fact is: Jews by their history and lives have special moral and ethical roles to play, and here we see a Barbarous ugly bald-headed demon, much like Hitler even sending innocent Jews to destruction…much like the pathetic ones in Hitler’s camps: Breyer is a self-hating despicable pretentious piece of shit for a human being: God is watching!
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell
Elizabeth Campbell Niagara Falls, NY
Posted: 11:10 am [PST] on July 08 2011
THE RIGHT TO LEAVE THE AMERICAN SOIL
U.N. CHARTER: I HAVE A RIGHT TO LEAVE A COUNTRY THAT IS PERSECUTING ME: JUSTICE BREYER IS PREVENTING ME FROM LEAVING THIS SOIL!
Unfortunately, California is not [t]he only state rifed with Korruption: Kprruption IS ENDEMIC TO THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE! While people of the Middle-east are shedding their blood and hoping to gain freedom, and Democracy, many, many people living in “the land of the free” have long realized that there is no such thing!
We are told almost daily that there are thousands (if not millions) committing illegal acts, and over-staying their visas in order to stay, or come to America…very few words are spoken of the thousands seeking to flee: Of those placed outside the protections of the Constitution, and being prevented from leaving!
Currently, Justice Stephen Breyer (a Jew, who is well aware of the history of Jews and their placement outside the protections of (you name the society)…not only the recent determined question by Hitler & his gang, but years and years of Inquisition and hatred, and Segregation in many countries, but this man of Jewish faith, has denied my right to work, and is currently using a well known KKK organizer Jeanne M. Kincaid into making sure that not only am I denied the right to work, the right to use my nursing license, but Kincaid consistently contacts anyone who rents me an apartment (since she over-saw the taking of my home) and using their attorney and Maryland Department of Licensing and labor (Elizabeth Trimble) in delaying unemployment benefits to me, which keeps me behind in rent payments and monthly court eviction orders, and then when a certain amount is accumulated, she makes sure that any court involve, adheres to Stephen Breyer’s way…DESTRUCTION, OF ME, AND HOMELESSNESS!
You see, my case was supposed to die…never grace the palacial province of the Supreme Court…they removed my former attorney Raymond Foss from the case, after the Magistrate Judge James Muirhead went on to list 1.5 pages of additional violations of the Hooksett, NH School District: Kincaid who had an investment to steal the taxpayer’s dollars (hence she had hacked into my computer, and wiretapped my cell phone and land-line) some 6 months prior to me submitting my case, after Chief Judge Stephen McAuliffe threatened my former attorney’s license and way of life (IF HE DID NOT REMOVE HIMSELF FROM ASSISTING ME)!
Kincaid (law-firm Drummond-Woodsum) a law-firm that routinely stole from the taxpayers of NH, conspired to steal again, and was not interested in settling any case with me (NON-MONIES…THUS GIVE MY SON AN EDUCATION ONLY)! Kincaid anxious to bring profit $$$ to Drummond-Woodsum (SHARE-HOLDER) Did not do what was in the interest of the school district! SHE MILKED THE DISTRICT, AND USED HER RACISM (AND SHE HATES JEWS…THIS IS KNOWN) TO CONTINUE TO DENY MY SON A FAPE, AND USED BREYER AND ROBERTS IN THE FACE OF THEIR BLATANT HYPOCRISY AND RACISM AFTER THE WINKLEMAN DECISION TO KEEP MY SON AND SELF HOMELESS EVEN NOW WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AFTER GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION OF 6 APPELLATE JUDGES UNDER SANDRA LYNCH FIRST CIRCUS COURT, CONCORD DISTRICT, AND THE HITLARIAN COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (SUPREME COURT) WHERE JUSTICES HOARD MILLIONS OF $$$$ AND DO NOT REPORT TO THE IRS, WHERE JUSTICES ORDER THE SILENT MURDER OF RESIDENTS, WHERE JUSTICES AND JUDGES ROUTINELY MANIPULATE BANKS, AND STEAL FROM INDIVIDUALS; WHERE JUSTICES IN THEIR SICK PERVERSION SEND PORN AND DEATH THREATS, AND USE THE FBI AND CIA TO HUNT, AND MURDER CITIZENS AND RESIDENTS, AND DENY RESIDENTS FROM LEAVING THIS BARBAROUS LAND! ALL OF THIS IS ONGOING IN THE LAND OF THE FREE, HOME OF THE BRAVE…A REAL SODDAH & GOMORRAH!
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell