|
|
 |
|
Broadcasting
of television, video and radio programs via a global computer network.
|
|
OC SHERIFF vs SUPERVISOR: PUBLIC PENSION CRISIS & UNION POLITICS
Internet exclusive: On Full Disclosure® Video News Blog
Video Preview Time:
8:32 min.
Release Date: September 11, 2007
Orange County, CA. The Full Disclosure Network ® presents two half-hour cable TV programs in an on-going series covering the escalating Public Pension Crisis. These latest episodes cover the Orange County California battle over public safety employees retroactive pension benefits granted by the Board of Supervisors in 2002.
Newly elected Supervisor John Moorlach, whose candidacy was opposed by the Orange County Sheriffs Deputies union, is leading a battle to rescind the “retroactive” portion of pension benefits granted to Deputies and District Attorney’s personnel who have already retired. Defending his Deputies and opposing Moorlach is Orange County Sheriff Mike Carona. Also appearing in the programs is Mario Mainero, Chief of Staff and legal advisor to Moorlach. The programs are hosted by Leslie Dutton and featured on 45 cable systems. An eight minute Internet video preview is available on 24/7, on demand from the Full Disclosure® website as a public service.
Here are just a few highlights and quotes from the programs:
- Supervisor John Moorlach describes state legislation sponsored by public employee unions that enabled public safety employees to receive “retroactive” pension benefits, saying it amounted to being “paid twice for services rendered.” Other Constitutional violations are cited.
- Sheriff Mike Carona explains that the legislation was intended to provide“ a benefit enhancement to aid recruiting and retention” of badly needed public safety employees. And, the Board of Supervisors knew the risk and liability before they approved the benefits.
- “Greed Has A Way Of Blinding You” Moorlach claims the reason public safety unions pushed for overly generous benefits is because the Deputies say to themselves “I deserve this” and he says “they are not thinking about the other services that will have to be cut…. “other public services for the homeless, welfare, healthcare and layoffs, people will have to stand I line” he said.
- Draconian Tactics: Sheriff Carona takes issue “with the way he (Moorlach) is going about this”. He says both he and Moorlach were opposed by the public safety union but describes Moorlach’s actions as retaliation and Draconian tactics, by also threatening to take away the Harbor Patrol duties from the Sheriff’s Department, creating a Citizens Oversight Commission for the Sheriff’s Department and removing Department control of a Special Needs Funding Account.
- Is It the Right Thing To Do? While John Moorlach describes the move to rescind retroactive benefits as “the right thing to do”, Sheriff Carona describes John Moorlach’s actions as a: full frontal assault against the Deputies” and that it “is not good Statesmanship” saying “He should not be using his authority (as Supervisor) to take it out on them.”
- Mario Mainero, Chief of Staff to Supervisor Moolach, cites the Sections of the Constitution where the pension benefits could be considered unlawful and states that this is a “Rule of Law” issue
Credit card Phone Orders and Donations accepted :
please call 310-822-4449 or Email sales@fulldisclosure.net
Or please make a Tax Deductible Contribution to the
Full Disclosure Network®
A Non-Profit Tax Exempt 501 (c) (3) Educational organization
|
| |
|
Full
Disclosure Network®is a registered trademark of the American
Association of Women and an electronic media and television production
of the
Citizens Protection
Alliance, a
501(c)(3) tax exempt educational organization.
2008 © All Rights Reserved. Full Disclosure Network®
337 Washington Blvd., Suite #1, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel 310.822.4449 Fax: 310.919.2890
|
|
Comments to date: 5. This is page 1 of 1.
joseph laguna
Posted: 09:09 pm [PST] on November 14 2007
it seems like moorlach is bound and determined to ruin orange county sheriff's morale. these are the ones who have to go out and protect the population.
phillip lambro los angeles
Posted: 09:19 pm [PST] on September 23 2007
This matter should be resolved in a real court of Law with an authentic impartial Judge; and not the types of Judges who evict people from their apartments and who themselves are apartment house owners.
Anthony Patchett Los Angeles
Posted: 04:21 pm [PST] on September 23 2007
They are trying to beat a dead horse.I don't see how they are going to get around the contract approved by the board of supervisors.There are some that end up with a great pension (law enforcement), but also die at an early age after retirement.(I've lost many of my former radio car partners).
Jim Newton Sacramento County
Posted: 05:53 am [PST] on September 18 2007
If Supervisor Moolach prevails, what value are contracts. Employees make life decisions based upon contractual promises of their employer. Further, it is a resonable expectation that a government entity knows or reasonably should know, the law before making contractual obligations. To take away what is now relied upon by retired and soon to retire employees would permantly injure their financial outlook. Shame on Mr. Moorlach.
Adriana Fourcher Corona Del Mar
Posted: 06:51 pm [PST] on September 17 2007
Again and again,Politicians have used taxpayers money to buy favortism with the public employee UNIONS. I give Supervisor Moorlach credit for rescinding the portion of benefits that are in excess of earnings and sound more like double compensation.