Los Angeles, CA. The Full Disclosure Network® presents a short video news report on what has been described by the volunteer legal team representing Richard I Fine as a “bombshell cover-up” by two U. S. District Court. Judge Magistrate Carla Woehrle and Judge John F. Walter denied a Fine's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus where they themselves were named as defendants. A copy of the Court Docket listing the chronolgy of what has happened can be found here.
The case of jailed Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I. Fine a prominent attorney who holds a PhD in International law has generated a protracted legal battle playing out in the U.S. Central District Court of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals all the while Fine has been held in solitary coercive confinement in the L.A. County Central Men’s jail since March 4, 2009 for civil contempt of court.
In his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in the U.S. District Court Mr. Fine cites on page 12 that the 5 day limit to hold him for “coercive incarceration” as having been violated by the L. A. Superior Court and the L A County Sheriff and 28 USC Section 2243 as having been violated by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle and Judge John Walter.
Fine also filed an emergency writ of mandate in the Ninth Circuit Court of appeal to order the District Court to issue the writ.
Appearing in the video are:
- Mardi Mason, Former Richard Fine law office manager now volunteer para-legal
- Fred Sottile, Volunteer for Richard Fine
- Leslie Dutton, Moderator, Full Disclosure Network
Other Related Documents:
Filed by Richard I. Fine in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Judicial recusals of all the Justices of the Second District Court of Appeal in the Sturgeon vs County of Los Angeles case regarding illegal payments made to L.A. Superior Court Judges.
Comments to date: 16. This is page 1 of 2.
james leventry jonstown pa.
Posted: 08:06 pm [PST] on June 13 2010
yes i feel the court administrators abuse through their positions is a subject never really understood. i have watched a prejudicial focus used by any or all cases where court administrators affix retired judges into cases that younger judges wish not to be overturned by a higher court for their younger counterparts.
Holli Lundahl Texas
Posted: 06:08 am [PST] on March 24 2010
I have been fighting judicial corruption for the past 20 years against high profile fortune 100 companies which initiated as a whistle blowing case against Eli Lilly. IN every single case over the past 20 years, judges who owned more than $ 1 million stock interests in these tort defendants companies, sat on my cases and obstructed them procedurally. I just finished another 2 1/2 year pretrail detention with ELI LILLY charging me for the 9th time of criminal acts dating back to my original whistleblowing against LILLY in 1991. The purpose of the criminal prosecution was not to bring me to justice on the criminal charges which were barred as a matter of law under the ex post facto and double jeopardy clauses, but instead the scheme was to force counsel upon me and to have a judge and not a jury decree me criminally insane and incapable of standing trial; a procedure unconstitutionally authorized by the mental incompetentcy statutes. Hearing transcripts were altered; court dockets were altered; evidence and records were grafted from the court file and destroyed in a grand cover up scheme. In addition, during my 2 1/2 year pretrial detention, I was assaulted, locked down in the hole, all of my communications with the outside world was censored, ant I was fed tainted food trays that caused me to suffer a stroke on one occasion and a near heart attack on another. Plus my medical records were manipulated to hide these atrocious acts which were witnessed by numerous inmates. I think, our representations should be required to pass a law which requires that a judge be disqualified from office if a petition of say 10,000 people move for disqualification of that judge. Right now there is only five methods available for removing judges. Those five methods are as follows: Article XV, Sec. 2 provides for removal of judges by the senate. Article XV, Sec. 6 provides for removal of district judges by the supreme court upon the sworn presentment of ten lawyers practicing before the judge whose removal is sought. Article XV, Sec. 8 provides for removal of judges by the governor upon a resolution of two-thirds of each house of the legislature. Article V, Sec. 1-a(8) empowers the Commission to recommend removal to a review tribunal composed of judges of the state courts of appeals. And finally, Article V, Sec. 24 provides for the removal of county judges and justices of the peace by state district judges.
If we cant sue judges for monetary damages, we should as citizens of the UNited States be able to remove those judges from office ourselves rather than deal with the political obstructions of congress doing their jobs to punish these judges for high crimes and misdemeanors. Holli
joebanana so. cal.
Posted: 11:52 am [PST] on January 31 2010
In case you haven't heard the update, the ninth circuit upheld that judges CAN dismiss cases which they're named as a defendant. In an unpublished decision by a "panel", after, being taken off the docket, in secret, these criminal conspirators confirmed that our justice system has been infiltrated by terrorists, domestic terrorists are running our courts, and homeland security has no clue.
ydobon washington state
Posted: 06:57 pm [PST] on January 28 2010
I THINK THE DAYS OF MABERRY ARE LONG GONE,OUR GOVERNMENT OFICIALS ACT LIKE 6 GRADERS ON RECESS GOING NENER NENER TO THE CITIZENS LIKE WE ARE THE 4 AND 5 GRADERS. THE FLIM FLAM MAN USED TO GET TARED AND FEATHERD NOW THEY RUN OUR GOVERNMENT,OUR CONSTITUTION IS JUST SOMETHING THAT GETS IN THEIR WAY OF ACCOMPLISHING THEIR OWN AGENDAS.
joebanana so. cal.
Posted: 09:36 pm [PST] on December 22 2009
Rick: the FBI, the USDOJ, the state attorney general, the sheriff, the governor, and more, they all say there's not enough evidence to initiate an investigation. There has been a mountain of evidence submitted, yet, they still refuse to do their duty. That's how bad it is. We've exhausted all non violent means.
joebanana so. cal.
Posted: 09:20 pm [PST] on December 22 2009
Holly cow, when I took the survey, and voted "yes"on number one, I was being a smart *ss, inferring, that the system is that corrupt, that they would do something that sick. Now, it's time for the pitch forks, and torch's. They don't have any good oak tree's near the court building, huh?
Rick Hester Birmingham, AL
Posted: 07:54 am [PST] on December 22 2009
It's unbelievable that a court system could be so flagrantly corrupt & nothing has been done to stop it. It should be headline news on every station every 30 minutes until Fine is released and the Gestopo is crushed. Where is the FBI?
Rochelle Location unknown
Posted: 05:12 pm [PST] on December 12 2009
I think everyone should go to the Governors website, and send a message to release Richard I. Fine. Everyone, who is not affiliated with the judicial system, and or the government knows he is innocent and this is extreme judicial abuse.
I know that Mr. Fine is not guilty. But in essence, he is a prisoner. I wrote to the governor and his staff sent me the standard blow off letter.
My purpose was in hopes that the governor would investigate the reason why Mr. Fine is being held, because there was no trial and no conviction, to pardon, and release him, because he is being held illegally.
I also sent a letter to Attorney General Jerry Brown, but he ignored me.
A citizen CA.
Posted: 11:01 pm [PST] on December 11 2009
Judicial extortion is the only reason Mr. Fine is in custody.
Judges intentionally acting arbitrary to law like a criminal syndicate.
We shall see how far up the ladder this criminal activity extends.
Harold Pick Santa Monica
Posted: 11:53 pm [PST] on December 10 2009
I have had the same problem
and I do not think the court
system works anymore and we
need to repair it by removing
the corruption.