Today's Date is:
Full Disclosure Network tm
Syndicate our programs!
 


VIDEO BLOGS
DESKTOP VIDEOS
BLOG RELEASES
PROGRAM GUIDE
BUY OUR PROGRAMS

SUBSCRIBE
SYNDICATE WITH RSS
SEARCH
Radio on the Web
TV Channel Guide

Court Corruption
Will LAUSD Survive?
Feds Nail OC Sheriff: Justice or Abuse?
Belmont & School Construction
CUSD Recall
Gangs
Valdemar/Gangs
Religion and Politics
Gun Issues
Historic California Recall
Immigration Policies
Media Ethics
Politics vs Terrorism
The Prosecutor & the Presidency
Re-appointment of LAPD Chief

Voter Fraud
Illegal Immigration
Political Corruption
War On Terrorism
Police Politics
Rule of Law
Border Security
Government Accountability
International Issues

Attorney General
District Attorney
Sheriff & Chief of Police
Mayor
Special Interest Groups
Education

Top Shows from our Archives

About Us
2001 Emmy Winner

Contact Us

Subscirbe to our news letter
Email:
Subscribe Unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Broadcasting of television, video and radio programs via a global computer network.
TWO U.S. JUDGES REFUSED TO RECUSE
Internet Exclusive Video News Blog: 9:30 min.
Release Date: November 22, 2009

Bookmark and Share
Donate
Please make a tax-deductible contribution to the Full Disclosure Network®
A non-profit tax exempt 501©(3) educational organization

Los Angeles, CA. The Full Disclosure Network® presents a short video news report on what has been described by the volunteer legal team representing Richard I Fine as a “bombshell cover-up” by two U. S. District Court. Judge Magistrate Carla Woehrle and Judge John F. Walter denied a Fine's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus where they themselves were named as defendants. A copy of the Court Docket listing the chronolgy of what has happened can be found here.

The case of jailed Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I. Fine a prominent attorney who holds a PhD in International law has generated a protracted legal battle playing out in the U.S. Central District Court of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals all the while Fine has been held in solitary coercive confinement in the L.A. County Central Men’s jail since March 4, 2009 for civil contempt of court.

In his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in the U.S. District Court Mr. Fine cites on page 12 that the 5 day limit to hold him for “coercive incarceration” as having been violated by the L. A. Superior Court and the L A County Sheriff and 28 USC Section 2243 as having been violated by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle and Judge John Walter.

Fine also filed an emergency writ of mandate in the Ninth Circuit Court of appeal to order the District Court to issue the writ.

Appearing in the video are:

  • Mardi Mason, Former Richard Fine law office manager now volunteer para-legal
  • Fred Sottile, Volunteer for Richard Fine
  • Leslie Dutton, Moderator, Full Disclosure Network

Other Related Documents:
Filed by Richard I. Fine in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Judicial recusals of all the Justices of the Second District Court of Appeal in the Sturgeon vs County of Los Angeles case regarding illegal payments made to L.A. Superior Court Judges.



Your name:

Your location:

Your comments:


Please type the code you see in the image
in the box below. (case sensitive)


Credit card Phone Orders and Donations accepted :
please call 310-822-4449 or Email sales@fulldisclosure.net

Or please make a Tax Deductible Contribution to the
Full Disclosure Network®
A Non-Profit Tax Exempt 501 (c) (3) Educational organization

Donate

Comments to date: 14.  This is page 1 of 2.

joebanana   so. cal.

Posted: 11:52 am [PST] on January 31 2010

In case you haven't heard the update, the ninth circuit upheld that judges CAN dismiss cases which they're named as a defendant. In an unpublished decision by a "panel", after, being taken off the docket, in secret, these criminal conspirators confirmed that our justice system has been infiltrated by terrorists, domestic terrorists are running our courts, and homeland security has no clue.

ydobon   washington state

Posted: 06:57 pm [PST] on January 28 2010

I THINK THE DAYS OF MABERRY ARE LONG GONE,OUR GOVERNMENT OFICIALS ACT LIKE 6 GRADERS ON RECESS GOING NENER NENER TO THE CITIZENS LIKE WE ARE THE 4 AND 5 GRADERS. THE FLIM FLAM MAN USED TO GET TARED AND FEATHERD NOW THEY RUN OUR GOVERNMENT,OUR CONSTITUTION IS JUST SOMETHING THAT GETS IN THEIR WAY OF ACCOMPLISHING THEIR OWN AGENDAS.

joebanana   so. cal.

Posted: 09:36 pm [PST] on December 22 2009

Rick: the FBI, the USDOJ, the state attorney general, the sheriff, the governor, and more, they all say there's not enough evidence to initiate an investigation. There has been a mountain of evidence submitted, yet, they still refuse to do their duty. That's how bad it is. We've exhausted all non violent means.

joebanana   so. cal.

Posted: 09:20 pm [PST] on December 22 2009

Holly cow, when I took the survey, and voted "yes"on number one, I was being a smart *ss, inferring, that the system is that corrupt, that they would do something that sick. Now, it's time for the pitch forks, and torch's. They don't have any good oak tree's near the court building, huh?

Rick Hester   Birmingham, AL

Posted: 07:54 am [PST] on December 22 2009

It's unbelievable that a court system could be so flagrantly corrupt & nothing has been done to stop it. It should be headline news on every station every 30 minutes until Fine is released and the Gestopo is crushed. Where is the FBI?

Rochelle   Location unknown

Posted: 05:12 pm [PST] on December 12 2009

I think everyone should go to the Governors website, and send a message to release Richard I. Fine. Everyone, who is not affiliated with the judicial system, and or the government knows he is innocent and this is extreme judicial abuse.
I know that Mr. Fine is not guilty. But in essence, he is a prisoner. I wrote to the governor and his staff sent me the standard blow off letter.
My purpose was in hopes that the governor would investigate the reason why Mr. Fine is being held, because there was no trial and no conviction, to pardon, and release him, because he is being held illegally.
I also sent a letter to Attorney General Jerry Brown, but he ignored me.

A citizen   CA.

Posted: 11:01 pm [PST] on December 11 2009

Judicial extortion is the only reason Mr. Fine is in custody.
Judges intentionally acting arbitrary to law like a criminal syndicate.

We shall see how far up the ladder this criminal activity extends.

Harold Pick   Santa Monica

Posted: 11:53 pm [PST] on December 10 2009

I have had the same problem
and I do not think the court
system works anymore and we
need to repair it by removing
the corruption.

Janette Isaacs   Chatsworth, CA

Posted: 03:39 pm [PST] on December 09 2009

Leslie: It was nice meeting you on Tuesday (12/8 @ MOT.)I truly believe that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal will affirm Judge Walter's ruling. If you knew the degree of corruption involved in my case, you would better understand the game of lawlessness and cover up by our L.A. Superior Court Judges. The Corruption is routinely endorsed by our CJP and Appellate Courts, as in my case. I am glad that you're following Mr. Fine's case so closely. Our prayers are with him. Thank you for the update. Please continue to keep us in the loop. Mr. Fine is being used as an example to all of us - civilians and attorneys alike. We need to start talking about what happens after the 9th Circuit affirms Walter's ruling. I am looking forward to that discussion.

Francis Knize   Conn.

Posted: 09:35 pm [PST] on November 22 2009

Go Leslie!

next 10
 

Full Disclosure Network®is a registered trademark of the American Association of Women and an electronic media and television production of the
Citizens Protection Alliance,
a 501(c)(3) tax exempt educational organization.

2009 © All Rights Reserved. Full Disclosure Network®
337 Washington Blvd., Suite #1, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel 310.822.4449 Fax: 310.919.2890

 

Site Meter