Janette M. Isaacs   Chatsworth, CA

Posted: 09:50 am [PST] on December 26 2011

Keep up the great work Leslie & TJ!
This event was awesome!

Full Disclosure Network   Los Angeles

Posted: 02:42 pm [PST] on December 11 2011

Other ways would be Child Custody case, Eminent Domain Cases, Conservatorships, Criminal Prosecutions, Zoning Enforcements, Health Code enforcements, Land Use, Building Permits, etc. etc. The county is a party to a case if they regulate or issue permits to build or license individuals to conduct business. In the case of election laws, the County certifies all the elections for validity and accuracy in election counts. that would include Bond measures, Initiatives, Candidacy, as long as they conduct the official election or are contracted with to process the counting of the ballots.

anonymous   L.A.

Posted: 02:22 pm [PST] on December 11 2011

Could you list all the ways that L.A. county is an interested party to the case. I know there is is the obvious (joe blow vs L.A. County) but where are all the other ways that L.A. County has an interest, Traffic tickets is an easy one but how many other ways??? and how?

Full Disclosure   Location unknown

Posted: 08:59 pm [PST] on December 08 2011

Anonymous
That Judge was was the "Activist Actor" Fred Sottile who is also an expert court critic. This short clip was the impersonation of Judicial conduct often found in the court rooms of California. We were poking fun at the pompous judges often talk as if they are they are God. We hope you will order the full 1 hr program and watch the entire presentation as it was hilarious.

Thanks for the comment and the compliment.

Anonymous   Location unknown

Posted: 06:47 pm [PST] on December 08 2011

That Judge was on your turf and as rude as rude could be. I smiled when he came up thinking alright, finally someone in a position to stop the injustice AND the dude was a JERK!!!! I hope you gave him bad eggs for breakfast!!! Thank you for all you do!!!!

BJ Davis   Beverly Hills, CA

Posted: 10:17 am [PST] on December 04 2011

Leslie & TJ:

Excellent work! Thank you all for being advocates and a voice for the people. I look forward to our working together.

The judge commentary is purely unbridled arrogance. Sending you a link to see the federal judiciary as well when we discussed.

http://roguesinrobes.com/

Tribute to Mr. Fine as well.
Julia sends our regards!

BJ & Julia Davis

Patricia Anderson   Ventura

Posted: 10:19 am [PST] on December 04 2011

Pat Hamer, you don't get it do you? It is not about fee disputes, it's about judicial corruption. We are all crime victims when there is no justice for anyone. Corruption is like a cancer that spreads to impact everyone.

Pat Hamer   El Dorado County, the seat of the Druid

Posted: 09:49 am [PST] on December 04 2011

I jest about the Druids, but near the court house in Placerville is a large monument with an eternal flame on top "eternally" funded by tax dollars to light the way for "Druids," and it is "dedicated to the town by the Druids of California." http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=16460

While you guys focus on fee disputes, the crime victim's of USA are also being denied justice, and that is my concern, yet the murders of citizens denied "equal protection" in retaliation for expressing dissatisfaction for negligent services, according to the court is the "cause of murder."

John O’Sullivan is in a list of dead bodies allowed to be murdered through willful negligence as a crime victim whose perpetrator was favored by the criminal justice system as was my case against the county.

O’Sullivan became a victim of retaliation by animal control, and this is supported by the fact that his original problem was property dispute, O’Sullivan was developing a subdivision in the early stages. Also the charges against him were dismissed and the horses were returned on the “day of trial.” This is also what they did to Kathleen Pastula, trying to get innocent people intimidated to plead guilty. They drag you through hell with fabricated evidence where there is no basis for it. This is what they did to me in my civil complaint, they made up evidence that didn’t exist, and it didn’t matter, because they ignored objections. They did this to O’Sullivan civil case and criminal case.

Macias v. IHDE states that arbitrary withholding of evidence and denying “crime victims” rights done by officials “is the cause of murder.” I argue that it would be simpler and more easier to murder someone by gunning them down, but you would go to prison. However, if you are an official, and someone complains against you for negligence, you can simply orchestrate the events that “cause murder” by abusing power under the color of law, and no one will question the outcome. Also you can imprison the actual murderer and be the hero at the same time. Pretty insane and ironic, but that is our system. O’Sullivan was murdered by an ex sheriff, Zimmerman, being protected by Vern Pierson who was aiding Zimmerman in settling a property dispute by ignoring the law in Zimmerman’s favor. When it wasn’t enough, Zimmerman murdered O’Sullivan, and is doing 40 years.

This occurred within days that Magistrate Brennan, who stated in this document, http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/caedce/2:2008cv00013/171253/45/0.pdf?1269946550 that, “there is no basis for accusing EDC of a “pattern of practice” when there were many cases, including mine, alleging the “pattern of practice claim.”

Nevertheless, Brennan denied our request for a protection order when though I had video evidence of our Neighbor, who was being protected and the prosecution of Gary Lacy was being undone by Pierson as he fixed all the previous felonies against our offender. He denied this when John O’Sullivan was murdered. Brennan was aware that people filing law suits to stop Vern Pierson from fixing felonies of favored citizens where being murdered or threatened with murder. Yet for some reason, Magistrate Brennan, according to two different civil right litigants who were supposed to be protected under the “Crime victims bill of rights” was allowing the murders and threats to occur and the evidence is his denying protection orders. The result is that the federal government ratified the murders and violence willfully.

I know these allegations do no set well with folks. But they are 100% true. I didn’t come up with this as a theory! It is a process of denial of equal protection under the 14th amendment and the court identifies it as a “cause of murder” that officials actually do., see Maria Teresa’s murder: state of Macias v. Ihde, 219 F.3d 1018, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2000): The “Court Concluded that:
“the court ignored the evidence that [the Appellees'] arbitrary failure to enforce the law caused [Mrs. Macias] to suffer not only her murder on April 15, 1996, but the three months of harassment, stalking, and death threats that proceeded it.” End quote!

This is shocking! And what is more shocking is that certain citizens are motivated to support the press in suppressing and censoring this news. Mountain Democrat aids in covering up and hiding the way officials murder citizens who complain against them. Harsh words yes, but supported by the Circuit Court of our district and the Supreme Court has not overturned this. U.S.A. used to criticize and still does in part, China and USSR, and Iran for this very thing that this traitorous Paper the MT democrat engages in.

Pat Hamer

Elizabeth Juanita Campbell   Niagara Falls, NY

Posted: 11:07 am [PST] on November 30 2011

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO BE OCCUPIED!
How else, would a conversation begin?

Ronald Pierce   Hell, aka California

Posted: 04:34 am [PST] on November 30 2011

Was the guy representing the judges in this video serious? If so, his gag order comment was beyond stupid. It was indicative of the very reason for recording him. What a dip@&$!