Los Angeles, CA Civic Activist David R. Hernandez has filed this a Writ of Mandate with the California Court of Appeals 2nd District asking the Court to Order Judge Robert H. O'Brien “Disqualified” from sitting on the case Hernandez vs. Superior Court. The primarily reasons cited by Hernandez O’Brien to be disqualified are the Judge has taken over $230,000 from the County of Los Angeles according to the L. A. Auditor Controllers Office while the County of Los Angeles. Yet, the Judge has refused to step down and has stricken Hernandez Motion to Disqualify him from hearing the case.
Judge O’Brien & Judge David Yaffe have Same Conflict of Interest
Featured in this Full Disclosure Network® video news blog, is legal analyst, John Baron, who points out the conflict Judge O'Brien is facing when being asked to set aside the previous “Void” Orders of Judge David Yaffe due to the fact he also has taken $860,000 from the County of Los Angeles. This issue involves the 2007 “Proposition R” purported to be a "Term Limit" measure but actually extended the City Council Terms from two to three, four year terms and then relaxed lobbyist reporting laws, violating the "One Subject Rule" of the California Constitution.
Hearing Set For Change of Venue Motion Set for October 12th 2011
Subsequent to recording this video, Judge O’Brien scheduled a hearing in his Superior Court Room on October 12, 2011 where David Hernandez’s Motions for a change of Venue, and to Set Aside Judge Yaffe’s Orders on Measure R will be heard.
Related Video Links:
Court Show Down On Ballot Fraud With David R. Hernandez (12:39 min)
[Watch all six segments from this link]
Comments to date: 30. This is page 1 of 3.
omkiwkb CLJIYWiERMWfxLz
Posted: 10:10 am [PST] on January 19 2012
XbvsLX , [url=http://dqdovtlqtjep.com/]dqdovtlqtjep[/url], [link=http://tbqsamptwfac.com/]tbqsamptwfac[/link], http://arysqiidkwjr.com/
qpfolr KdottfTQyVcRmetv
Posted: 03:37 am [PST] on January 19 2012
DDgNqu ekuaichawiqg
rvcnasey CDIUOAYwJpGHgCfcPF
Posted: 05:53 am [PST] on January 18 2012
FumHax , [url=http://vjrlwzuzriaf.com/]vjrlwzuzriaf[/url], [link=http://qnkluezydyft.com/]qnkluezydyft[/link], http://wwqmeqgegemg.com/
akihctpaktp IIkkIdqdscedYPjV
Posted: 12:35 am [PST] on January 18 2012
lUrEOK qdoixtmkbhxv
Nikki wltYYXjgLwrXFDWy
Posted: 03:18 am [PST] on January 17 2012
Times are changing for the better if I can get this olnnie!
Sharon Stephens Montclair, CA
Posted: 11:32 am [PST] on December 30 2011
I am still waiting on my motion in Riverside County, and for a disclosure of judicial benefits from the court.
The presiding judge in San Bernardino sent me the most inane letter in regards to the motion I won there against Judge Sabet.
I have had some health problems -- left overs from my time in jail and living in my car for a year - but I have not given up and will go forward after the first of the year.
Bless you all :-)
~Sharon Stephens
Rick Abrams Beverly Hills
Posted: 09:43 am [PST] on November 01 2011
I have practiced law in California since the 1970's. In the beginning, we had to put up with some kooks and SOBS', but since 1986 the entire judiciary has been corrupt. My estimate is that 80% of the judges make ruling based on what is best for their careers which requires that they not offend the politicos who put them into power. The judges will decimate a civil case against an insurance company or a real estate developer. The judges in West District knew about the massive real estate frauds that Countywide was perpetrating back in 2005, but the judges attacked the homeowners who complained, thereby allowing the frauds to continued until we had the meltdown in 2008.
If people had a clue to 1/10 of the fraud and corruption in the judiciary, they'd move their tents to 111 N. Hill St.
Anonymous Location unknown
Posted: 09:45 am [PST] on October 26 2011
I should mention, thought the feds defrauded is, in the "cover-up" against us, Judge James Wagoner was admonished by the CJP.ca.gov see http://www.cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/public_admon/Wagoner_DO_9-13-11.pdf
I am the 2009 case, but he did it again to Penny Arnold, and he's still on the bench.
The point is, Penny Arnold and Myself have had a judge punished, and no civil right group such as this will give this case credence. It is the successful efforts that are hid by media, such as this that has a motive of ego or lack of understanding on how to use momentum to get the work done. I suspect that this site may also be now just a egomania or marketing for profit site. Momentum is a basic law that uses inertia to propel energy in order that energy is not wasted.
Until groups like this grab hold of inertia, our plight is wasted energy.
Pat Hamer Absolute Immunity victim
Posted: 09:44 am [PST] on October 26 2011
What you are saying is very bizarre, and unbelievable! Our America? How can that be? After all we have the 10 amendments and the 14th for a citizen to rest assured that he is safe. At least that was the case until 1795 when the 11th amendment basically barred suits that allege 42 USC 1983 or 1985 abuse of power under the color of law claims. Basically, it stems from 14th century dogma, “par en parem imperium non habet.” I’m not going to explain it because it is magically confounding and self deceiving! It is too big for our minds. After all, it has been hidden in the open for 250 years without much scrutiny, and it is the basis for all revolutions, and the cultivation of corruption that protects aristocrats, emperors, dictators, and now any U.S. employee of state, federal and local municipality by giving them “absolute immunity.” Though municipalities call it “qualified immunity,” all that is need is a Judge to “abuse his discretion” which also is non actionable as a Judge has absolute Immunity from corruption, Bogan v. Scott-Harris, or Stump v. Sparkmen. “Par en parem imperium non habet” was used to justify the inquisitions or despotic tortures in order “deter” people who objected to authority by using logic to do so.
While those on lists like these will give credence to what you are alleging, the first amendment is a deception that took the Soviets and Chinese almost a century to figure out. They had closed government, we had an open one. Our dissidents volunteer their plans, locations, and intent, under a foolish guise of freedom. Whereas, the Soviets and Chinese had search and destroy to find theirs.
The very act of exercising the First Amendment is an act of defeat. Redress of Grievance, defined by Webster alludes to the trouble right away. Redress of Grievance, results because the victim requiring the redress only requires it because he is so Emotionally distressed, that he sees no choice but to bring this grievance to the courts. As soon as you complain, you appear to be emotionally distressed. Officials taking the complaint, have learned that less work that pays the same can be done by discouraging “emotionally distressed” people from filing complaints. Thus, they created a system that is a booby trap designed to enhance the “emotional distress” a victim suffers. This causes them to bow out, or become enraged, or commit suicide, or the very stubborn are procedural instituted as “vexatious” or simply found in contempt, because “emotionally distressed” outbursts in court will result in Jail. Case closed, an now you will have your finances vacuumed from your life, and all you did was call 911, or file a suit.
We thought “redress of grievance” was constitutionally protected! It is not! It is the bullet in the head that stops those who have become emotionally distressed enough to redress a grievance. As soon as you open the door to redress, you are “shot in the head” by your emotional state. Its brilliantly diabolical way to ignore claims and work less, and extract revenues from the victims, who they would otherwise have no claim.
Do I have any basis to this theory? Well yes I do in fact.. Macias is a case in the Ninth circuit that shows how really sick officials “cause the murder” of emotionally disturbed crime victims who want the police to go out of their way and enforce restraining orders.
Estate of Macias v. Ihde, 219 F.3d 1018, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2000):
The Appellants contend that the district court "fundamentally misconstrued" the constitutional deprivation at issue in this case. They maintain that the alleged constitutional deprivation occurred when the defendants failed to provide Mrs. Macias with equal police protection in the months leading up to her death. Their brief states: 35
The district court erred in determining that there was insufficient evidence of actual causation in part, by misconstruing [the Appellants'] constitutional injury as `murder' rather than `lack of equal protection.' By so doing, the court ignored the evidence that [the Appellees'] arbitrary failure to enforce the law caused [Mrs. Macias] to suffer not only her murder on April 15, 1996, but the three months of harassment, stalking, and death threats that proceeded it.
“…arbitrary failure to enforce the law caused [Mrs. Macias] to suffer not only her murder on April 15, 1996, but the three months of harassment, stalking, and death threats that proceeded it.
I emphasized the text showing that “arbitrary failure to enforce laws, according to the Ninth Circuit is the “cause for murder.” They made no mention of the actual assailant who was given liberty despite the rational basis that required them to make arrests. The case is not precedent to show cause on officials for “failing to prevent murder” but for “arbitrarily denying 14th amendment rights to crime victims.” Now we have a strong Constitutional Amendment called the Crime Victims bill of Rights, in state, and federal constitutions.
This hit home with me. My wife and I were being stalked and threatened with murder, it is a very long story, and I will not waste time rehashing the details. But though 5 separate families won restraining orders after evidentiary hearings, so we were not irrational.
Basically the county was allowing this man to assault crime victims and vandalize their property, ours was about 7000 dollars damage, and it was witnessed, and he told people he did it, and his wife told the arresting officer why he did it.
The threats and assaults were video taped. One incident when he was ordered to say 300 feet away shows him missing me in his truck by only about a foot or less.
So what, I guess, A police officer stated in a report that I had a web site that insinuated that El Dorado Officials turned a blind eye to murder victims, and he stated, “based upon these facts, I will not make an arrest.”
So then we get to federal court and attempt to get a federal injunction from Magistrate Brennan, but he denied it without mentioning our controlling law, basically with a boiler plate basis of standard “justiciability” for denying injunctions. He weighed the perps right to murder over our right to not be protected from violence, Gonzales v. Castle Rock and felt that preventing a potential murderer would far out weigh the reasonableness of protecting my wife and I.
I was shocked to find that a few weeks within his decision, another Pro Se litigant was claiming “arbitrary” abuse by the same defendants I was suing, Neves, Pierson, Wagoner, inter alia.
But what was shocking was the other litigant was being threatened with murder also by a neighbor.
Like I said, within a few weeks of Magistrate Brennan’s denial of our claim, Mr. John O’Sullivan was murdered, and Brennan was the Judge that stood in the way of his life!
So, when I use the Ninth Circuit Macias case and say that officials who are being publicly criticized for not enforcing the law, all the officials have to do is continue arbitrary “singling out” disgruntled crime victims, and let nature take its course, and voila, they often get murdered, and now nobody is exposing or making public statements about their misdeeds.
Sounds very paranoid and irrational to make such claims! But the Ninth Circuit pointed this out in Macias, so the premise is cogent, and the conclusions that result in death, the only issue that lies unclear is intent, and that will never need be reviewed, except that malice is the willful ignoring of the law in a pattern of conduct, and could be inferred I suppose.
So…I think if I heard someone stating what I just stated, I would assume they were off their rocker, but facts is facts! Is this some sort of knowable perfect crime, or just serious coincidences that lead to murder?
Pat Hamer
530-295-8141
Elizabeth Juanita Campbell Niagara Falls, NY
Posted: 12:43 pm [PST] on October 10 2011
Thomas Jefferson Warned That The Judiciary Is The Greatest Threat To The DEMOCRACY!
WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!
In reference to the 3 questions surveyed:
To Donna from NC, judicial Corruption is an endemic pathos within ALL 50 STATES! Just place any state within Google and by Golly YOU WILL SEE THE SWARMS OF FLEAS!
Since the evidence is clear that not only the media survives in fear of the Judiciary; and since even the clergy have been silenced (I recently realized this via the St. Paul’s Episcopal church in Buffalo New York (where a priest there told me that he would put me in touch with “someone who could help my son and self”…we are still waiting, and would continue to wait forever…Kincaid has let them know [w]ho is boss! Thus even the Clergy (and I have experienced this with many organizations including Catholic ones that tremble when the knowledge and full reality of what is happening to my son and self is revealed to them as I show them copies of the documents)…it is clear that they too are afraid!
Since the Federal Judges and Justices have co-opted the laws in favor of their continued oppression and corruption taking a case to the next level is a waste of time! Who would you expose the media to? In other words, you need their help with publicity???
With major communications effectively cut off (and even the Congress, Justice Department or President…they all are lame and fearful at the end of the day. Clearly John Roberts is the little guy with your power. WHAT MUST BE DONE?
Although America did not ratify the Rome Statues, cases of Human Rights Abuses can still be adjudicated by the International Criminal Court! First the complaint (s) must be brought before the 5 (including America) permanent members of the U.N. for a vote in order that they could recommend the case to the International criminal Court.
I say that we need a CRIMINAL CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL JUSTICES AND INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL JUDGES BEFORE THE WORLD-WIDE CRIMINAL COURT, DOCUMENTING THE CRIMES, THE OPPRESSION, AND THE THEFT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION UPON THE PEOPLE BY THE NAMED FEW IN BLACK!
The above includes the named Supreme Court Judges of the State of California etc!
ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES ARE A PART OF THE MERRY-GO-ROUND!
They have COMPLETELY TAKEN AWAY ANY OUT-GOING MAIL OF MINE! On August 31st, 2011, Jeanne M. Kincaid (government lawyer and immoral person who sent porn and death threats to my then 10 year old son with the cover of Steven McAuliffe Chief district Judge NH, and Magistrate Judge James Muirhead) paid embassy personnel money to intercept my documents to the permanent members of the U.N. COULD THEY DO THIS ON A LARGE SCALE?
CAN THEY STOP THE LARGE SCALE CLASS ACTION SUIT OF THOUSANDS?
Look at the Sedition and Treason that is common place within the American Judiciary…right from the Supreme Court down to the District Court! Indeed there are so many individual cases of out and out Violations of the Constitution, and all across America Black or White, yellow or Green… abuse of the litigant(s) falsifying of documents; theft of documents; telephone and cell-phone wireless wiretapped; computer hacking (I have 3 of them here right now watching me as I write this…with 2 FBI agents…and I have not committed any crimes, harbored no terrorists); Tracking via satellite; U.S. mail interception; Social isolation; Bombarded with Death Threats and Porn, (Jeanne Kincaid…angel of death) denied the very Unemployment, Food Stamps and Medicaid you are forced on! You may even receive a letter from say the Massachusetts DOR (Department Of Revenue) telling you that your child is no longer entitled to Child-Support because he is 18 years old…when he is only 14… So says his mother, his birth certificate and his passport) the latter which they allowed me to receive, only to deny us the real ability to leave: WHO SAYS THIS IS ONLY HAPPENING IN CHINA? IF THAT IS TRUE, FOR WE HEARD THIS FROM THE U.S GOVERNMENT…PATHOLOGICAL LIARS AND PROPAGANDA HUSTLERS!
Any normal person under the persecution above would leave the country that’s persecuting…many Jews left countries (rightfully so) that persecuted them.
WE ARE BEING STARVED! WE HAVE NO FOOD! NOTHING TO DRINK! KINCAID WILL NOT ALLOW IT! COULD NOT GO TO CHURCH BECAUSE WE HAVE NO MONEY TO GET THERE VIA THE BUS!
If I try to leave with my son, the father will say he does not this almost 15 year old boy to leave…a man Mark Higgins who has not seen his son since age 8, is now receiving a BRIBE from the U.S. Judiciary so that his son (and myself) CANNOT ESCAPE THE NIGHTMARE!
This is the country America that rocks the world with its lawfulness, its respect of law and order… some law and order! Please help us. We are living in a room at the Niagara Falls YMCA (1317 Portage RD, Niagara Falls NY 14301). Do not write to me, I will not receive your mail. Please forward my mail to the International criminal court; tell them I have lots of evidence and documentation from the various courts, and evidenc of the crimes committed by Jeanne M. Kincaid (who belongs in jail).
I have been and continue to be prevented from working not because I have committed a crime, or murdered someone in my business of being an LPN, but because I went after my son’s rights (as well as my own) UNDER THE LAW! (First Amendment and the IDEA) UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO LEGAL REDRESS: PLEASE FORWARD, FAX, MAIL COPIES OF MY LETTERS TO GENEVA, BELGIUM, ENGLAND, WIKI-LEAKS, N. KOREA, CHINA, VENEZUELA, THE ENTIRE U.N. THE WORLD!
Perhaps someone with greater understanding could expand upon how Mr. Hernandez, Dr. Fine, and others can document injuries and lawsuits with respect to the American judiciary and bring before the U.N. and the International Criminal Court. We have lots of Judges and almost all the Justices who desperately need to be imprisoned or given the death penalty! These are but a few of thousands!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87SCTEsIufY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX_OaRQicFQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaXINizSj7E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJY85V3w3xM&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku8nPOun9SE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34RZ-nIp4Yw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52dNfwcb_qw&feature=related
.com/watch?v=1HcKBau1QTU&feature=related