Judges Fight to Keep Illegal Benefits #VB73
July 20, 2009Comments are closed.
Los Angeles, CA. On July 13, 2009 a Superior Court hearing was held on the Judicial Watch motion for Injunctive Relief in the Sturgeon vs County of Los Angeles case BC351286, a taxpayers lawsuit where in October 2008, the Fourth Appellate Court District decision found of Los Angeles County payments to the Judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court were illegal. The decision was upheld by the California Supreme Court when a petition for rehearing was denied to the Los Angeles Superior Court who had hired Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, one of the most powerful and influential legal firms in the country.
Specially appointed Appellate Court Judge James A. Richman from San Francisco presided on this July 13th hearing and after oral arguments, took the matter into submission. His decision on the Judicial Watch motion for an injunction is expected in 30 to 60 days.
The Full Disclosure Network® presents an eleven minute Video News Report on that hearing with interviews of the Judicial Watch attorneys Sterling Norris and Paul Orfanedes who describe what happened in the court room and the background of the case.
Claiming that the emergency provision inserted into the February 11, 2009 Budget Bill, known as SBX 2 11 had retroactively made the County’s payments to the Judges legal, it also provided for Judicial criminal immunity from prosecution and liability and to the County officials involved in the transfer of what has been estimated to be almost $300 million dollars over the past twenty years.
Full Disclosure Network® contacted the following Court officials to interview them on this matter but has been told that the Judges and their legal counsel do not want to be interviewed on this case.
- Judge Mary Wiss, President California Judges Association
- Michael Belote, Cal Advocates Lobbyist for CJA on SBX 2 11
- Judge Charles McCoy, Presiding Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court
- J. Frederick Bennett, L.A. Superior Court Legal Counsel
- Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (for Superior Court)
- Are Judicial Double Benefits Constitutional? Judges To Rule on Judges Benefits Round II #VB92
- State Bar Documents Reveal Judges Silencing Attorneys: Full Disclosure Network Video® Report #VB104
- Judges Muster Power, City Attorney To Stop Citizen Challenge To Their Corruption #VB103
- Two U.S. Judges Refused to Recuse #VB81